Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 21, 2025

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
Published on: September 4, 2017
Inter-centre variability of CT-based stopping-power prediction in particle therapy: Survey-based evaluation
Vicki T Taasti1, Christian Bäumer2, Christina V Dahlgren3
1Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Stopping-power ratios (SPRs) in particle therapy vary significantly between centers due to differences in CT scan parameters and Hounsfield Look-Up-Table (HLUT) definitions. Standardization is needed to improve SPR accuracy and treatment quality.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Stopping-power ratios (SPRs) are crucial for calculating particle range in particle therapy.
- The heuristic CT-to-SPR conversion (Hounsfield Look-Up-Table, HLUT) is essential for treatment planning.
- HLUT derivation depends on CT scan, reconstruction parameters, and HLUT definition, leading to potential inter-center variability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess inter-center differences in CT scan parameters and HLUT definitions used for SPR derivation.
- To evaluate the current practices in particle therapy centers regarding CT-based SPR calculations.
- To identify areas for standardization in CT-to-SPR conversion for improved treatment planning.
Main Methods:
- A survey questionnaire was distributed to twelve particle therapy centers (ten in Europe, two in the USA).
- The questionnaire gathered details on CT scanners, image acquisition/reconstruction, HLUT definition, body-region specific HLUT selection, beam-hardening investigations, and experimental HLUT validations.
- Technological improvements' potential to enhance SPR accuracy was rated.
Main Results:
- Significant variations were observed in scan parameters and HLUT definitions across centers.
- The stoichiometric method was used by eight centers, while three used tissue-substitute-only HLUTs; one center combined both.
- HLUT line segments varied widely (2-11), and validation schemes differed substantially among centers that performed experimental validations. Dual-energy CT was considered promising.
Conclusions:
- Substantial inter-center variability exists in CT scan implementation, image reconstruction, and CT-to-SPR conversion specification.
- Standardization is recommended to reduce institution-specific efforts and variations in treatment quality.
- Due to parameter interdependencies, conclusions on the accuracy and variability of derived SPRs could not be drawn from this study.
More Related Videos
08:34Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
07:57Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation