Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 20, 2025

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: June 25, 2019
Confidence Limits of Word Identification Scores Derived Using Nonlinear Quantile Regression
Vijaya K Narne1,2, Sören Möller1,2, Anne Wolff3
1Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
This study establishes a lower boundary for maximum speech identification scores (PBmax) in sensorineural hearing loss. Scores below this limit may indicate disproportionately poor speech understanding for a given hearing loss degree.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Speech Perception Research
- Hearing Science
Background:
- The relationship between sensorineural hearing loss severity and maximum speech identification scores (PBmax) is crucial for audiological diagnosis.
- PBmax scores exhibit significant inter-subject variability for a given hearing loss degree, necessitating the establishment of normative boundaries.
- Understanding the lower limit of expected PBmax is vital for identifying individuals with unexpectedly poor speech recognition.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the lower boundary of maximum speech identification scores (PBmax) in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss.
- To establish a reference point for identifying 'disproportionately' poor speech identification relative to the degree of hearing loss.
- To provide a tool for more accurate audiological diagnosis and rehabilitation planning.
Main Methods:
- PBmax scores were measured using the Dantale I word list in 1,961 young and older subjects with sensorineural hearing loss.
- Speech testing was conducted at 30 dB above the speech reception threshold or at the most comfortable level.
- A nonlinear quantile regression approach was used to estimate the lower limit of the one-tailed 95% confidence limit (CL) for PBmax scores across a range of pure-tone averages.
Main Results:
- The study successfully estimated the lower boundary (95% CL) for PBmax scores as a function of pure-tone average.
- A method was developed to identify PBmax scores that fall below this established lower boundary.
- This lower boundary provides a statistical reference for assessing speech identification performance.
Conclusions:
- A specific lower boundary for PBmax scores in sensorineural hearing loss was defined using quantile regression.
- Measured PBmax scores falling below this 95% confidence limit may indicate disproportionately poor speech identification.
- This finding aids in the clinical identification of atypical speech recognition performance in individuals with hearing loss.
Related Concept Videos
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Confidence Intervals
A...
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

