Efficacy of bicarbonate therapy for adults with cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 17, 2025

Utilizing the Modified T-Maze to Assess Functional Memory Outcomes After Cardiac Arrest
Published on: January 5, 2018
Wachira Wongtanasarasin1, Karan Srisurapanont1
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Insights
Bicarbonate therapy does not appear to improve survival rates for adults experiencing cardiac arrest (CA) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This meta-analysis found no significant benefit for hospital admission survival in acute or prolonged CPR cases.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Critical Care
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Bicarbonate therapy's role in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for cardiac arrest (CA) is not well-established.
- Current guidelines do not routinely recommend bicarbonate therapy due to unclear benefits.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical benefits of administering bicarbonate therapy to adult patients suffering from cardiac arrest.
Main Methods:
- A systematic meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted, searching major databases up to April 2020.
- Three RCTs involving 1344 patients were included, comparing bicarbonate therapy against placebo in adult CA patients.
- Primary outcome was survival to hospital admission; secondary outcomes included circulation return, discharge survival, and neurological status.
Main Results:
- Bicarbonate therapy demonstrated no significant improvement in survival to hospital admission (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.73-1.25).
- Subgroup analysis for prolonged CPR yielded similar non-significant results (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.10-8.01).
- The quality of included trials was rated as fair to poor, with limitations in blinding and reporting.
Conclusions:
- Bicarbonate therapy may not offer benefits for improving hospital admission survival rates in adults with cardiac arrest, regardless of CPR duration.
- Further high-quality research is needed to definitively ascertain the efficacy of bicarbonate in cardiac arrest management.
Objectives:
Because the benefits of bicarbonate therapy remain unclear, it is not routinely recommended for the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) given to individuals with cardiac arrest (CA). This study aims to evaluate the clinical benefits of bicarbonate therapy in adults with CA.
Methods:
Without any language restriction, we searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL from the inception until April 30, 2020. We performed hand-search to identify the relevant trials included in previous meta-analyses. Included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing bicarbonate and placebo treatment in adults with CA. Two authors independently assessed the trial risk of bias. The primary outcome was the survival to hospital admission. The secondary outcomes included the return of spontaneous circulation, the survival to hospital discharge, and the neurological outcome at discharge. We calculated the odds ratios of those outcomes using the Mantel-Haenszel model and assessed the heterogeneity using the I2statistic.
Results:
Our searches found 649 unduplicated studies. Of these, three RCTs involving 1344 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The trial risk of bias ranged between fair and poor, mainly due to no blindness of outcome assessment and the selective reports of outcomes. Bicarbonate therapy showed no significant improvement in the survival to hospital admission (odds ratio [OR] 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-1.25). Subgroup analysis in those receiving prolonged CPR showed a similar result (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.10-8.01). No study reported the predefined secondary outcomes.
Conclusion:
For both acute and prolonged CPR, bicarbonate therapy might not show benefit to improve the rate of survival to hospital admission in adults with cardiac arrest.
Related Concept Videos
Bicarbonate-Carbonic Acid Buffer
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Diagnosing Acidosis and Alkalosis
First, the pH level is assessed to determine whether the blood pH is normal (7.35–7.45), low (acidosis), or high (alkalosis).
Next, the PCO2 and...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Bronsted-Lowry Acids and Bases
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use

