Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 1, 2026

Minimally Invasive Thumb-sized Pterional Craniotomy for Surgical Clip Ligation of Unruptured Anterior Circulation Aneurysms
Published on: August 11, 2015
Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Intracranial Hypertension in Children
Zhanna B Semenova1, Semen Meshcheryakov2, Valery Lukyanov2
1Clinical and Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Trauma, Moscow, Russia. JSeman@mail.ru.
Insights
Decompressive craniectomy (DC) can improve outcomes in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) by controlling intracranial pressure (ICP). However, factors like low Glasgow Coma Scale scores and pupil response predict unfavorable results in pediatric TBI patients.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Pediatric Neurology
- Trauma Surgery
Background:
- Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a controversial procedure for managing refractory intracranial pressure (ICP) elevations.
- Its invasiveness, undefined indications, variable outcomes, and complication risks contribute to ongoing debate.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify factors associated with unfavorable outcomes following DC in children with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Main Methods:
- A longitudinal study involving 64 children with severe TBI (mean age 4.8 years, GCS 6±2 on admission).
- Follow-up was conducted over a 6-month period to assess outcomes.
Main Results:
- Good recovery (GOS 4-5) occurred in 45.3%, severe disability (GOS 3) in 31.0%, and poor outcomes (GOS 1-2) in 23.4%.
- Mortality rate was 18.7%.
- Unfavorable prognostic signs included GCS < 5, dilated unreactive pupils, and ICP >40 mmHg. ICP characteristics were the most sensitive predictor.
Conclusions:
- DC may prevent dislocation syndrome but can be futile in cerebral herniation.
- Outcomes are primarily determined by the severity of primary and secondary brain injuries.
Objectives:
Decompressive craniectomy (DC) for control of refractory intracranial pressure (ICP) elevations remains a controversial procedure because of its invasiveness and lack of clearly defined indications, the absence of an established surgical technique, the variability of its outcomes, and the significant risk of complications.
Aim:
The purpose of this study was to identify factors for unfavorable outcomes after DC in children with a severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Methods:
A longitudinal investigation of correlations was carried out in 64 children (mean age ± 4.8 years) with severe TBI and a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 6 ± 2 on admission. The follow-up period was 6 months.
Results:
There was good recovery (with a Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score of 4-5) in 45.3% of cases, severe disability in 31.0% of cases (with a GOS score of 3); and a GOS score of 1-2 in 23.4% of cases. Twelve patients (18.7%) died. Unfavorable prognostic signs were a GCS score < 5 (P = 0.0003); dilated, unreactive pupils (P < 0.05); and ICP >40 mmHg (P = 0.0003; P < 0.05). ICP characteristics appeared to be the most sensitive predictor of outcomes after secondary DC (P < 0.05).
Conclusion:
DC may be effective in preventing dislocation syndrome but futile in cases of cerebral herniation. Outcomes after DC are determined by the severity of the primary and secondary brain injuries.
Related Concept Videos
Increased Intracranial Pressure l: Introduction
Increased Intracranial Pressure ll: Pathophysiology
Cerebral Edema l: Introduction
Cerebral Edema ll: Pathophysiology

