Pair-Matching Digital 3D Models of Temporomandibular Fragments Using Mesh-To-Mesh Value Comparison and Implications...

The mesh-to-mesh value comparison (MVC) method developed by Karell et al. (Int J Legal Med 130(5):1315-1322, 2016) facilitates the digital comparison of three-dimensional mesh geometries obtained from laser-scanned or computed tomography data of osteological materials. This method has been employed with great success to pair-matching geometries of intact skeletal antimeres, that is, left and right sides. However, as is frequently the case for archaeological materials, there are few circumstances which proffer complete skeletal remains and fewer still when considering contexts of commingling. Prior to the present research, there existed a paucity of sorting techniques for the diverse taphonomic conditions of skeletal materials found within commingled assemblages, especially regarding fragmentary remains. The present chapter details a study in which the MVC method was adapted to encompass comparisons of isolated components of bone in lieu of entire bone geometries in order to address this dearth. Using post-mortem computed tomography data from 35 individuals, three-dimensional models of 70 mandibular fossae and 69 mandibular condyles were created and then compared using Viewbox 4, to produce numerical mesh-to-mesh values which indicate the geometrical and spatial relationship between any two given models. An all-to-all comparison was used to determine if the MVC method, using an automated Trimmed Iterative Closest Point (TrICP) algorithm, could be utilized to (1) match corresponding bilateral pairs of condyles and fossae and (2) match same-sided articular correlates. The pair-matching of both the condyles and the fossae generally produced high sensitivity and specificity rates. However, the articulation results were much poorer and are not currently recommended.