Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology01:30

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

297
Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
297
Scientific Laws and Theories02:31

Scientific Laws and Theories

84.1K
Scientific Laws
84.1K
MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry01:19

MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry

6.0K
Mass spectrometry is a powerful characterization technique that can identify and separate a wide variety of compounds ranging from chemical to biological entities, based on their mass-to-charge ratio (m/z). The instruments that allow this detection, known as mass spectrometers, have three components: an ion source, a mass analyzer, and a detector. These spectrometers differ based on the nature of their ion source and analyzers.
Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) is a commonly...
6.0K
Psychology as a Science01:13

Psychology as a Science

3.4K
Psychology, as a scientific discipline, aims to understand the mind and behavior through rigorous and systematic methods. The foundation of psychological research is evidence-based, relying heavily on the scientific method to derive and validate knowledge. This structured approach ensures that findings are reliable, valid, and applicable to broader contexts.
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
3.4K
Biodiversity and Human Values01:24

Biodiversity and Human Values

15.9K
Human civilization relies on biodiversity in many ways. Sudden changes in species biodiversity result in environmental changes that can modify weather patterns and therefore human civilizations.
15.9K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

6.2K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Explaining individual differences.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2023
Same author

Physiological constraints and cognitive chunking: Sequence organization in the songs of zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).

Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983)·2023
Same author

Muscles or Movements? Representation in the Nascent Brain Sciences.

Journal of the history of biology·2023
Same author

"Defeaters" don't matter.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2019
Same journal

Transferring ways of thinking and mathematizing: The statistical approach between physics and biology.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

The Dynamics of Quantum Gravity: The Missing Piece in the Spacetime Emergentist Account.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

A frame-based approach for reconstructing theories.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

Strategic ignorance, and the management of performative effects: Lessons from climate economics.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

Fictionalism and scientific realism: A response to ungrounded criticism.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

Is Emergy really a theory of value ?

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 6, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K

On value-laden science.

Zina B Ward1

  • 1Department of Philosophy, Florida State University, 151 Dodd Hall, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA.

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
|May 10, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study clarifies how values influence scientific choices by categorizing their roles (motivation, justification, causation, impact). This framework resolves philosophical debates on values in science, particularly inductive risk arguments.

Keywords:
Argument from inductive riskJustifying reasonsMotivating reasonsValuesValues in science

More Related Videos

Unraveling the Unseen Players in the Ocean - A Field Guide to Water Chemistry and Marine Microbiology
10:43

Unraveling the Unseen Players in the Ocean - A Field Guide to Water Chemistry and Marine Microbiology

Published on: November 5, 2014

26.0K
Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging
09:19

Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging

Published on: April 18, 2025

1.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 6, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K
Unraveling the Unseen Players in the Ocean - A Field Guide to Water Chemistry and Marine Microbiology
10:43

Unraveling the Unseen Players in the Ocean - A Field Guide to Water Chemistry and Marine Microbiology

Published on: November 5, 2014

26.0K
Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging
09:19

Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging

Published on: April 18, 2025

1.0K

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Science
  • Ethics in Scientific Research

Background:

  • Ambiguity in how values influence scientific decisions hinders philosophical analysis.
  • Existing frameworks lack clarity on the relationship between values and scientific choices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To disambiguate the various ways values impact scientific choices.
  • To provide a taxonomy for understanding value-laden decisions in science.
  • To resolve philosophical problems concerning values in scientific practice.

Main Methods:

  • Characterization of four distinct roles values play in relation to choices: motivation, justification, causation, and impact.
  • Application of the proposed taxonomy to analyze the argument from inductive risk.

Main Results:

  • Identified four key ways values interact with scientific choices.
  • Demonstrated that the argument from inductive risk primarily concerns the justification role of values.
  • Showcased the utility of the taxonomy in clarifying philosophical arguments.

Conclusions:

  • A clear taxonomy of value-choice relationships can solve and dissolve philosophical problems in science.
  • Understanding how values justify scientific choices is crucial for analyzing arguments like inductive risk.
  • This framework enhances clarity and assessment of philosophical arguments about values in science.