Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

12.9K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.9K
Cultural Influences on Personality01:26

Cultural Influences on Personality

189
Individualist and collectivist cultures emphasize different core values, shaping personality in distinct ways. In individualist cultures, such as those in the United States, England, and Australia, people prioritize independence, competition, and personal achievement. These societies tend to promote self-focused traits, with individuals often reporting higher levels of self-esteem. In contrast, collectivist cultures, commonly found in regions like Asia, Africa, and South America, emphasize...
189
Human Genetics01:28

Human Genetics

610
Human genetics provides a profound framework for understanding the interplay between genetic predispositions and human psychology. At the heart of this discipline lies the study of how genes influence physical traits, behaviors, and susceptibility to diseases. Each person carries a unique genetic code that subtly or significantly shapes their psychological and behavioral landscape.
The complex relationship between genetics and psychology is observable through common biological components such...
610
Heritability01:06

Heritability

230
Heritability is a statistical concept that measures the degree to which genetic differences among individuals contribute to trait variations within a population. It is a fundamental idea in genetics, often prone to misinterpretation. Heritability is expressed as a percentage, reflecting the proportion of variation in a specific trait across a population that can be linked to genetic differences. However, it's important to understand that heritability does not determine how "genetic"...
230
Biological Influences on Intelligence01:30

Biological Influences on Intelligence

144
Intelligence is often thought to be linked to brain size, but the relationship is more complex than that. While brain size does correlate modestly with some abilities, like verbal skills, the connection is weaker for others, such as spatial reasoning. Other factors, like brain structure, also play crucial roles. For instance, despite Einstein's smaller-than-average brain, his parietal cortex, which is involved in spatial reasoning, was 15% wider, suggesting that neural density might matter...
144
Attribution Theory00:56

Attribution Theory

13.0K
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).
13.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Physiological constraints and cognitive chunking: Sequence organization in the songs of zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).

Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983)·2023
Same author

Muscles or Movements? Representation in the Nascent Brain Sciences.

Journal of the history of biology·2023
Same author

On value-laden science.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2021
Same author

"Defeaters" don't matter.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2019
Same journal

Transferring ways of thinking and mathematizing: The statistical approach between physics and biology.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

The Dynamics of Quantum Gravity: The Missing Piece in the Spacetime Emergentist Account.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

A frame-based approach for reconstructing theories.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

Strategic ignorance, and the management of performative effects: Lessons from climate economics.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

Fictionalism and scientific realism: A response to ungrounded criticism.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

Is Emergy really a theory of value ?

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.4K

Explaining individual differences.

Zina B Ward1

  • 1Department of Philosophy, Florida State University, 151 Dodd Hall, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA.

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
|September 15, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study explains psychological variation by focusing on causes that can reduce population variability, not just individual differences. Understanding variation is key to advancing causal explanation in psychology.

Keywords:
Actual difference makersCausal explanationExplanationIndividual differencesInterventionismVariation

More Related Videos

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding
06:33

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding

Published on: October 11, 2018

6.9K
Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.4K
Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding
06:33

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding

Published on: October 11, 2018

6.9K
Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.0K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Philosophy of Science
  • Causal Inference

Background:

  • Psychological research often seeks universal generalizations, potentially overlooking the significance of individual variation.
  • Philosophical accounts of scientific explanation have predominantly focused on generalizations, neglecting the phenomenon of variation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To characterize explananda concerning individual differences in psychology.
  • To formulate a novel account for explaining variation and individual differences.
  • To critically evaluate existing causal concepts for explaining variation.

Main Methods:

  • The study analyzes the concept of 'actual difference making' in relation to explaining variation.
  • It proposes a new framework for explaining individual differences based on interventionist causality.
  • The research focuses on identifying causes that can modify population variability.

Main Results:

  • The notion of 'actual difference making' is insufficient for grounding an account of explaining variation.
  • Explaining individual differences requires identifying causes amenable to intervention for reducing variability.
  • The proposed account offers criteria for successful explanation of variation.

Conclusions:

  • A new perspective on causal explanation is offered, prioritizing intervention on causes of variation.
  • This approach deepens the understanding of how to explain individual differences in psychological research.
  • The study highlights the importance of variation as a target for scientific explanation.