Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

State Space Representation01:27

State Space Representation

340
The frequency-domain technique, commonly used in analyzing and designing feedback control systems, is effective for linear, time-invariant systems. However, it falls short when dealing with nonlinear, time-varying, and multiple-input multiple-output systems. The time-domain or state-space approach addresses these limitations by utilizing state variables to construct simultaneous, first-order differential equations, known as state equations, for an nth-order system.
Consider an RLC circuit, a...
340

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Optimizing action separation and integration through moderate practice.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Guiding gaze via gaze: Effect anticipation during intentional saccadic gaze leading.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Current developments of Psychological Research and the use of AI.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Shifting focus: Does adaptation to new configural face information alter fixation behavior?

Vision research·2026
Same author

Face adaptation: Investigating non-configural contrast alterations.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same author

Evidence for a Latent Bottleneck After Extensive Dual-Task Practice of a Visual-Manual and an Auditory-Verbal Task.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2025
Same journal

EXPRESS: Age-related Differences in Recognition Memory for Discourse: The Case of Modified Words, Competitors, and Related Lures.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Exaggerated Self-Referencing in Body Dysmorphic Disorder.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Post-Error Adjustments: The role of Response Stimulus Intervals and error placement.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Mitigating the Low Prevalence Effect: Role of Removing Explicit "Target-Absent" Responses in Visual Search.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Visual Selection Is Spatially Constrained During Working Memory Consolidation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Cross-Phoneme Generalisation of Dimension-Based Statistical Learning for Stop Voicing: Probing Subject Design and Word Frame Effects.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 4, 2025

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

3.7K

Task-order representations in dual tasks: Separate or integrated with component task sets?

Lynn Huestegge1, Mareike A Hoffmann1, Tilo Strobach2

  • 1University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|May 24, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Task order control is crucial when performing multiple tasks simultaneously. This study shows that task order is integrated with specific task characteristics, especially when switching between oculomotor and manual tasks is unpredictable.

Keywords:
Dual-task controltask prioritisationtask-order representationtemporal task organisation

More Related Videos

Motor Dual-Tasks for Gait Analysis and Evaluation in Post-Stroke Patients
05:23

Motor Dual-Tasks for Gait Analysis and Evaluation in Post-Stroke Patients

Published on: March 11, 2021

2.6K
RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

3.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 4, 2025

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

3.7K
Motor Dual-Tasks for Gait Analysis and Evaluation in Post-Stroke Patients
05:23

Motor Dual-Tasks for Gait Analysis and Evaluation in Post-Stroke Patients

Published on: March 11, 2021

2.6K
RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

3.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Deciding task execution order is vital for simultaneous task performance.
  • Response order control is influenced by bottom-up (stimulus) and top-down (instructional) factors.
  • Prioritization of certain response modalities (e.g., oculomotor tasks) affects task order.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate whether task-order representations are coded separately or integrated within task sets.
  • Examine task-order coding during unpredictable trial-to-trial task switching.
  • Determine if task order is represented in a task-specific manner.

Main Methods:

  • Combined oculomotor and manual/pedal tasks across three experiments.
  • Introduced unpredictable task order switches between trials.
  • Measured reaction times (RTs) to assess task-order switch costs.

Main Results:

  • Observed robust task-order switch costs (longer RTs when task order switched).
  • Demonstrated an asymmetry in task-order switch costs.
  • Found it easier to switch to the prioritized task order (oculomotor task first) in most settings.

Conclusions:

  • Task order is represented in an integrated, task-specific manner during frequent, unpredictable task switching.
  • Task order representations are bound to the characteristics of component tasks, such as effector systems.
  • Findings suggest a unified coding for task order linked to specific task demands and response modalities.