Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.3K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.3K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.2K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.2K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

7.7K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
7.7K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.1K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.1K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

97.8K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
97.8K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

8.0K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
8.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

System-Level Calibration of a Millimeter-Wave Vector Signal Analyzer with Uncertainties.

IEEE transactions on microwave theory and techniques·2026
Same author

Millimeter-wave Channel-Sounder Performance Verification using Vector Network Analyzer in a Controlled RF Channel.

IEEE transactions on antennas and propagation·2022
Same author

A Significance Test for Reverberation-Chamber Measurement Uncertainty in Total Radiated Power of Wireless Devices.

IEEE transactions on electromagnetic compatibility·2021
Same author

Uncertainty in Large-Signal Measurements Under Variable Load Conditions.

IEEE transactions on microwave theory and techniques·2021
Same author

Precision Millimeter-Wave-Modulated Wideband Source at 92.4 GHz as a Step Toward an Over-the-Air Reference.

IEEE transactions on microwave theory and techniques·2021
Same author

A General Waveguide Circuit Theory.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2017
Same journal

Low-Frequency Calibration of Accelerometers by Rotation in the Gravitational Field at NIST.

Metrologia·2026
Same journal

Measurement of the <sup>27</sup>Al<sup>+</sup> and <sup>87</sup>Sr absolute optical frequencies.

Metrologia·2026
Same journal

Leveraging the revised International System of Units: torque from the fundamental constants.

Metrologia·2026
Same journal

Uncertainty of the measurement of the frequency dependence of four-terminal pair capacitance with a four-channel vector network analyzer.

Metrologia·2026
Same journal

Primary activity measurement of an Am-241 solution using microgram inkjet gravimetry and decay energy spectrometry.

Metrologia·2026
Same journal

Calibrating laser Doppler anemometers utilizing an optical chopper.

Metrologia·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 2, 2025

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.4K

Consistency in Monte Carlo Uncertainty Analyses.

Benjamin F Jamroz1, Dylan F Williams1

  • 1National Institute of Standards and Technology, 325 Broadway, Boulder CO, 80303 USA.

Metrologia
|June 16, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Consistent Monte Carlo methods are crucial for accurate uncertainty evaluation in complex, distributed, and sequential analyses. This study recommends reproducible replicates for reliable computational results.

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K
Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package
06:37

Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package

Published on: September 17, 2021

4.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 2, 2025

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.4K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K
Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package
06:37

Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package

Published on: September 17, 2021

4.7K

Area of Science:

  • Computational science and metrology

Background:

  • Monte Carlo methods are standard for measurement uncertainty evaluation.
  • Complex analyses often require distributed computing across multiple nodes.
  • Sequential analysis of previous results is common in scientific research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To emphasize the necessity of consistent Monte Carlo (MC) methods in distributed and sequential uncertainty analyses.
  • To propose a practical implementation for ensuring reproducibility in complex MC simulations.
  • To discuss techniques for validating the accuracy of such implementations.

Main Methods:

  • Reviewing the principles of Monte Carlo uncertainty quantification.
  • Analyzing the challenges of maintaining sample distribution consistency in parallel and sequential processing.
  • Recommending a framework for reproducible replicate generation in distributed computing environments.

Main Results:

  • Inconsistent Monte Carlo sample distributions can lead to inaccurate uncertainty quantification.
  • Reproducible replicates are essential for reliable results in distributed and sequential analyses.
  • A consistent implementation ensures the integrity of uncertainty propagation.

Conclusions:

  • Consistent Monte Carlo methods are vital for accurate uncertainty evaluation in complex computational tasks.
  • The proposed implementation addresses the need for reproducibility in distributed and sequential analyses.
  • Accurate implementation and validation are key to trustworthy uncertainty quantification.