Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Repeated device-based measures of daily movement, sedentary behavior, and sleep at 6 months postpartum: the Pregnancy Environment and Lifestyle Study-2 cohort.

Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society·2026
Same author

Rationale and protocol for the Time to Move Randomized Crossover Trial: morning versus evening time physical activity and CGM-assessed glucose levels in individuals with pregnancy hyperglycemia.

Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare·2026
Same author

Results From the 2024 United States Report Card on Physical Activity for Children and Youth.

Journal of physical activity & health·2025
Same author

A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial of a Behavioral Physical Activity Intervention for Pregnancy Hyperglycemia.

Journal of pregnancy·2025
Same author

Monitoring sleep duration, timing, and continuity among US youth and adults in NHANES using actigraphy.

Sleep health·2025
Same author

Performance of wearable light sensors for measuring photopic and melanopic illuminance under laboratory and free-living conditions.

Sleep·2025
Same journal

Real-Time Versus Video-Recorded Step Count Validation Among Young Adults.

Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour·2026
Same journal

The Ability of Monitor-Independent Movement Summary Units, Euclidean Norm Minus One, and Mean Amplitude Deviation to Harmonize Accelerometry Data Across Research-Grade and Consumer Wearable Devices During Simulated Free-Living Physical Activity in Children.

Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour·2026
Same journal

Measurement Reactivity in Ecological Momentary Assessment Studies of Movement-Related Behaviors.

Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour·2026
Same journal

The Concurrent Validity of the ActiGraph LEAP Compared to the ActiGraph GT9X Link for Measuring Physical Activity.

Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour·2026
Same journal

Performance evaluation of algorithms to estimate daily sedentary time using wrist-worn sensors in free-living adults.

Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour·2025
Same journal

Identifying Multicomponent Patterns and Correlates of Accelerometry-Assessed Physical Behaviors Among Postmenopausal Women: The Women's Health Accelerometry Collaboration.

Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 29, 2025

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
06:17

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

5.0K

Evaluating the Performance of Sensor-based Bout Detection Algorithms: The Transition Pairing Method.

Paul R Hibbing1, Samuel R LaMunion1, Haileab Hilafu2

  • 1The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Department of Kinesiology, Recreation, and Sport Studies.

Journal for the Measurement of Physical Behaviour
|July 14, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Evaluating bout detection algorithms is difficult. The Transition Pairing Method (TPM) assesses algorithm performance by comparing predicted transitions to a criterion measure, improving accuracy in wearable sensor data analysis.

Keywords:
ACCELEROMETERDYNAMIC SEGMENTATIONPERFORMANCE METRICSYOUTH SOJOURN MODELS

More Related Videos

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
08:05

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

10.9K
Uncovering Beat Deafness: Detecting Rhythm Disorders with Synchronized Finger Tapping and Perceptual Timing Tasks
09:04

Uncovering Beat Deafness: Detecting Rhythm Disorders with Synchronized Finger Tapping and Perceptual Timing Tasks

Published on: March 16, 2015

13.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 29, 2025

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
06:17

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

5.0K
Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
08:05

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

10.9K
Uncovering Beat Deafness: Detecting Rhythm Disorders with Synchronized Finger Tapping and Perceptual Timing Tasks
09:04

Uncovering Beat Deafness: Detecting Rhythm Disorders with Synchronized Finger Tapping and Perceptual Timing Tasks

Published on: March 16, 2015

13.0K

Area of Science:

  • Wearable sensor technology
  • Biomedical engineering
  • Data analysis algorithms

Background:

  • Bout detection algorithms segment data from wearable sensors.
  • Assessing the correctness of bout detection segmentation is challenging.
  • Accurate segmentation is crucial for analyzing physical activity and behavior patterns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and demonstrate the Transition Pairing Method (TPM).
  • To provide a novel method for evaluating bout detection algorithm performance.
  • To standardize the assessment of segmentation correctness in wearable sensor data.

Main Methods:

  • The TPM compares predicted transitions to a criterion measure based on number and timing.
  • A true positive is a predicted transition matched to a criterion transition within a defined time lag.
  • The Gale-Shapley algorithm pairs transitions; unpaired predictions/criteria are false positives/negatives.

Main Results:

  • With a 1-s lag, recall was <20% and precision was <10% for tested algorithms.
  • Over 80% of criterion transitions were missed, and over 90% of predicted transitions were incorrect.
  • Significant differences were observed between algorithm performance metrics.

Conclusions:

  • The TPM offers a standardized approach to evaluating bout detection algorithms.
  • It provides specific, actionable insights into algorithm performance beyond conventional metrics.
  • This method enhances the reliability of wearable sensor data analysis for research.