Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 25, 2025

11:51
An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
Published on: February 10, 2014
15.7K
Resonance frequency analysis of implants placed in condensed bone
Balazs Feher1,2, Florian Frommlet3, Reinhard Gruber1,4,5
1Department of Oral Biology, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Clinical Oral Implants Research
|August 6, 2021
Summary
Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) reliably monitors implant stability in condensed bone for late placements. However, RFA is unreliable for immediate implant placements into condensed fresh extraction sites.
Area of Science:
- Dental Implantology
- Biomaterials Science
- Surgical Research
Background:
- Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measures dental implant stability via the Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ).
- ISQ is presumed to correlate with insertion torque, a key indicator of primary implant stability.
- The reliability of RFA in condensed bone, a challenging surgical environment, requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the correlation between RFA (ISQ) and insertion torque in condensed versus untreated bone.
- To assess the influence of bone density (bone volume fraction) on implant stability measurements.
- To determine the feasibility of RFA for monitoring implant stability in different clinical scenarios.
Main Methods:
- Human cadaver study utilizing a split-mouth design.
- Implants were placed in edentulous jaws and fresh extraction sockets with or without bone condensation.
- Measurements included ISQ, peak insertion torque, and bone volume fraction (BV/TV) pre- and post-surgery.
Main Results:
- In edentulous jaws, ISQ and insertion torque showed strong correlations in both untreated (r=0.63) and condensed bone (r=0.82).
- In fresh extraction sockets, the correlation was significant in untreated bone (r=0.78) but absent in condensed bone (r=0.15).
- Preoperative bone volume fraction predicted insertion torque and ISQ in edentulous jaws, but not in extraction sockets.
Conclusions:
- RFA is a reliable method for assessing implant stability after late placement in condensed bone.
- RFA is not reliable for monitoring implant stability immediately after placement in condensed fresh extraction sites.
- Bone density significantly influences the relationship between RFA and insertion torque, particularly in immediate placement scenarios.

