Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 16, 2025

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
Published on: September 28, 2022
Meeting Faculty Development Needs: Review of Current Resources and Opportunities for Program Development.
Tara Catanzano1, Lori A Deitte1, David M Naeger1
1Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate (T.C.), 759 Chestnut Street, Springfield, MA 01199; Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center (L.A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee (D.M.N.), Denver, Colorado; UAB Department of Radiology (D.E.M.), Birmingham, Alabama; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Cooper University Hospital (P.G.), Camden, New Jersey; Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical Center (P.J.S.), Boston, Massachusetts.
This review examines faculty development programs across early, mid, and late career stages. It identifies challenges and suggests best practices for tailored institutional and national programming to support faculty career progression.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Academic Medicine
- Faculty Development
Background:
- Faculty career progression presents unique challenges at different stages.
- Effective faculty development programs are crucial for academic institutions.
- Current programming may not adequately address the evolving needs of faculty.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review faculty development focus and programming for early, mid, and late career stages.
- To identify challenges faced by faculty at each career juncture.
- To propose best practices for future faculty development initiatives.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of existing faculty development programs.
- Analysis of institutional and national programming strategies.
- Synthesis of challenges and best practices across career stages.
Main Results:
- Faculty needs vary significantly by career stage (early, mid, late).
- Existing programs show a range of effectiveness in addressing specific career challenges.
- Gaps exist in comprehensive, stage-specific faculty development support.
Conclusions:
- Tailored faculty development programs are essential for career longevity and success.
- Institutions should implement stage-specific programming addressing identified challenges.
- Further development of national and institutional strategies can enhance faculty support.
More Related Videos
13:44Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Current Trends in Nursing II
Review and Preview
Current Trends in Nursing I
Preclinical Development: Overview
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Restorative Care