Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 13, 2025

Author Spotlight: Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies
Published on: March 17, 2023
Routine Decontamination of Working Canines: A Study on the Removal of Superficial Gross Contamination
Seneca L Bessling1, Sarah L Grady1, Elizabeth C Corson1
1Seneca L. Bessling, MS, is a Molecular Biologist, Asymmetric Operations Sector; Sarah L. Grady, PhD, is a Senior Research Scientist, Asymmetric Operations Sector; Elizabeth C. Corson, MS, is a Senior Image Analyst, Asymmetric Operations Sector; Veronica A. Schilling is an Intern Research Scientist, Asymmetric Operations Sector; Natalie M. Sebeck, MS, is a Microbiologist, Asymmetric Operations Sector; Jennifer H. Therkorn, PhD, is a Senior Aerosol Scientist, Asymmetric Operations Sector; Bryan R. Brensinger is an Image Analyst/Molecular Biologist, Research and Exploratory Development Department; and Karen L. Meidenbauer, DVM, MPH, is Project Manager/Senior Veterinarian, Asymmetric Operations Sector; all at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD.
Abstract:
Odor detection canines are a valuable resource used by multiple agencies for the sensitive detection of explosives, narcotics, firearms, agricultural products, and even human bodies. These canines and their handlers are frequently deployed to pathogen-contaminated environments or to work in close proximity with potentially sick individuals. Appropriate decontamination protocols must be established to mitigate both canine and handler exposure in these scenarios. Despite this potential risk, extremely limited guidance is available on routine canine decontamination from pathogenic biological materials. In this article, we evaluate the ability of several commercial off-the-shelf cleansing products, used in wipe form, to remove superficial contamination from fur, canine equipment, and toys. Using Glo Germ MIST as a proxy for biological contamination, our analysis demonstrated more than a 90% average reduction in contamination after wiping with a Nolvasan scrub solution, 0.5% chlorhexidine solution, or 70% isopropyl alcohol. Wiping with nondisinfectant baby wipes or water yielded an almost 80% average removal of contaminant from all surfaces. Additionally, researchers used Gwet's AC2 measurement to assess interrater reliability, which demonstrated substantial agreement (P < .001). These data provide key insights toward the development of a rapid, convenient, and fieldable alternative to traditional water-intensive bathing of working canines.
Related Concept Videos
PPE Use in Healthcare Settings II: Doffing
Handwashing II: Pre-procedure and Initial Procedure Steps
The hand washing procedure itself includes the following steps. First, cover cuts, if any, on hands with a waterproof dressing. Cuts and abrasions can become contaminated with bacteria hindering the ability to clean the area thoroughly. In addition, repeated hand washing can worsen an injury. The nails must be short and clean, without nail...
Handwashing III: During the Procedure and Post-Procedure Steps
Hand hygiene
Hand washing...
Cleaning, Sterilization, and Disinfection
Cleaning
The cleaning process usually involves using water with detergents or enzymatic cleaner and removing foreign material from objects and surfaces, including organic material such as body fluids or inorganic material like soil. Cleaning is performed before high-level disinfection and sterilization because foreign materials on the cover of the devices interfere with process...
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...

