Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

696
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
696
Purposive Learning01:22

Purposive Learning

225
E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a...
225
The Nativist Approach01:21

The Nativist Approach

188
The nativist approach to infant cognitive development proposes that infants are born with inherent knowledge structures that allow them to interpret the world almost immediately. This perspective contrasts with earlier developmental theories, such as those proposed by Jean Piaget, which emphasized a more gradual acquisition of cognitive abilities through interaction with the environment. One key concept in this approach is object permanence — the understanding that objects continue to...
188
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.0K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.0K
Evolutionary Psychology01:20

Evolutionary Psychology

524
Evolutionary psychology explores the origins of human behavior and mental processes by framing them within the context of natural selection, a theory famously propounded by Charles Darwin. This field asserts that many behaviors common across human societies — ranging from instinctive fear reactions to complex social interactions — arose as evolutionary adaptations. These adaptations enhanced the survival and reproductive success of our ancestors, thereby becoming embedded in the...
524
Cognitivism01:17

Cognitivism

2.3K
Cognitive psychology emerged as a significant field in the mid-20th century. It focused on understanding humans' internal mental processes. This approach emphasizes how people perceive, remember, think, and solve problems—elements critical to human cognition.
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process...
2.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Animal empathy reconsidered: a multidimensional profile account.

Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society·2026
Same author

The evolutionary transition from intentional to overt communication: The role of script recognition.

Psychological review·2026
Same author

Three types of phenomenal consciousness and their functional roles: unfolding the ALARM theory of consciousness.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2025
Same author

Children's reasoning strategies on call and Tomasello's nonverbal false belief test: no sign of false-belief reasoning.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2025
Same author

Apheresis procedures for the treatment of patients and for the collection of cellular therapy products: A British Society for Haematology guideline.

Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)·2025
Same author

Comparing level 1 and level 2 visuo-spatial perspective-taking in the brain: evidence from fMRI.

Social neuroscience·2025
Same journal

Are language models models?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Large language models illuminate the mechanistic underpinnings of the creative aspect of language use (CALU), long regarded as a mystery.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

LLMs as a platform for studying constraint interaction: Motivation and challenges.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Beyond the data gap: Children create languages, violate their input statistics, and exhibit critical periods.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Not-so-strange love: Language models and generative linguistic theories are more compatible than they appear.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Rich data drive generalization: Lessons from machine learning for linguistics and cognitive science.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 12, 2025

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.3K

Teleology first: Goals before knowledge and belief.

Tobias Schlicht1, Johannes L Brandl2, Frank Esken3

  • 1Institute of Philosophy II, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, GA3/29, 44780Bochum, Germanytobias.schlicht@rub.de, www.rub.de/philosophy/situatedcognitionalbert.newen@rub.de, Julia.Wolf-n8i@ruhr-uni-bochum.de.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|November 19, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Comparing knowledge and belief requires careful definition. Mismatched definitions lead to flawed comparisons, but a teleological perspective offers a better approach.

More Related Videos

Experience is Instrumental in Tuning a Link Between Language and Cognition: Evidence from 6- to 7- Month-Old Infants' Object Categorization
05:35

Experience is Instrumental in Tuning a Link Between Language and Cognition: Evidence from 6- to 7- Month-Old Infants' Object Categorization

Published on: April 19, 2017

6.8K
Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
07:31

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

6.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 12, 2025

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.3K
Experience is Instrumental in Tuning a Link Between Language and Cognition: Evidence from 6- to 7- Month-Old Infants' Object Categorization
05:35

Experience is Instrumental in Tuning a Link Between Language and Cognition: Evidence from 6- to 7- Month-Old Infants' Object Categorization

Published on: April 19, 2017

6.8K
Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
07:31

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

6.8K

Area of Science:

  • Epistemology
  • Philosophy of Mind

Background:

  • Comparing knowledge and belief is central to epistemology.
  • Previous comparisons may suffer from definitional inconsistencies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the pitfalls in comparing knowledge and belief.
  • To propose a more robust framework for understanding their relationship.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of 'knowledge' and 'belief' definitions.
  • Examination of logical inconsistencies in comparative claims.
  • Development of a teleological framework.

Main Results:

  • A wider notion of knowledge paired with a narrow notion of belief creates an invalid comparison.
  • A narrow notion of knowledge lacks sufficient evidential support for comparison.
  • A teleological view offers a superior alternative.

Conclusions:

  • Precise definitions of knowledge and belief are crucial for valid epistemological comparisons.
  • The proposed teleological view addresses limitations of existing frameworks.
  • This work refines the understanding of the knowledge-belief relationship.