Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 12, 2025

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
Postoperative Computed Tomography for Facial Fractures
Elana B Smith1, Lakir D Patel2, David Dreizin3
1Trauma and Emergency Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Radiologists must understand surgical principles and hardware for effective facial reconstruction reporting. This knowledge aids in evaluating postoperative CT scans for midface, orbital, and mandible fractures.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Surgical Anatomy
- Orthopedic Surgery
Background:
- Effective communication between radiologists and facial reconstructive surgeons is crucial for optimal patient outcomes.
- Radiologists require a foundational understanding of surgical techniques and implants used in facial reconstruction to interpret postoperative imaging accurately.
- Current reporting practices may lack the necessary detail for surgeons to fully utilize radiologic assessments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To enhance radiologic reporting for facial reconstructive surgery by elucidating surgical principles and hardware.
- To provide radiologists with the knowledge to infer hardware selection and anticipate complications from postoperative CT scans.
- To improve the efficiency and salience of radiology reports in the context of midface, internal orbital, and mandible reconstructions.
Main Methods:
- Review of common surgical approaches for midface, internal orbital, and mandible fractures.
- Analysis of typical hardware used in these reconstructions (e.g., plates, screws, meshes).
- Correlation of surgical rationale with expected postoperative imaging findings on computed tomography (CT).
Main Results:
- Identification of key surgical principles guiding reconstruction of facial bones.
- Categorization of commonly used hardware and their typical placement.
- Development of a framework for anticipating potential complications based on surgical technique and hardware observed on CT.
- Demonstration of how to assess the adequacy of reconstruction using postoperative CT.
Conclusions:
- A comprehensive understanding of surgical management and hardware is imperative for radiologists reporting on facial reconstructions.
- Radiologists can infer hardware choices and anticipate complications by understanding surgical rationale.
- This approach facilitates more meaningful and actionable reports for facial reconstructive surgeons, improving postoperative assessment of midface, internal orbital, and mandible fractures.
Related Concept Videos
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...

