Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 11, 2025

08:45
Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
Published on: October 24, 2012
14.8K
Spatial sampling of MEG and EEG based on generalized spatial-frequency analysis and optimal design
Joonas Iivanainen1, Antti J Mäkinen1, Rasmus Zetter1
1Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Aalto FI-00076, Finland.
Neuroimage
|December 1, 2021
Summary
This study determines optimal spatial sampling for electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) sensors. Findings suggest specific sample numbers for on-scalp MEG, off-scalp MEG, and EEG, and propose a new method for sensor placement.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Biophysics
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) measure brain activity using sensors on the scalp.
- Spatial sampling density is crucial for accurately capturing the spatial-frequency content of these brain signals.
- Current sensor placement strategies may not be optimized for maximizing information retrieval.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the optimal spatial sampling density for EEG and MEG.
- To investigate the spatial-frequency content of signals acquired with different sampling strategies.
- To propose and evaluate a novel approach for determining optimal sensor locations.
Main Methods:
- Simulated realistic head models to analyze spatial sampling.
- Calculated spatial-frequency content for on-scalp MEG, off-scalp MEG, and EEG.
- Developed and tested a model-informed approach for sensor location optimization.
Main Results:
- On-scalp MEG, off-scalp MEG, and EEG benefit from up to 280, 90, and 110 spatial samples, respectively.
- A novel method for optimizing sensor locations based on prior assumptions and uniformity was proposed.
- Model-informed non-uniform sampling is beneficial for low sample numbers, while uniform grids suffice for high sample numbers.
Conclusions:
- The study provides evidence-based recommendations for spatial sampling densities in EEG and MEG.
- The proposed sensor placement approach allows for tailored optimization based on specific research needs.
- Both uniform and model-informed sampling strategies have roles depending on the number of spatial samples used.

