Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methodological considerations in functional assessment.

C Bombardier1, P Tugwell

  • 1University of Toronto Rheumatic Disease Unit, Wellesley Hospital, ON, Canada.

The Journal of Rheumatology. Supplement
|August 1, 1987
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Developing an evidence base to inform retirement home policy development using an equity and diversity lens: a mixed methods study protocol.

BMC geriatrics·2025
Same author

Standardizing health outcomes for people with rheumatoid arthritis receiving disease modifying drug therapy: A rapid review of patient-decision aids and preference studies to inform the development of OMERACT Health Outcome Descriptors.

Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism·2025
Same author

Sex and Gender Appraisal Tool-Systematic Reviews-2 and Participation-To-Prevalence Ratio assessed to whom the evidence applies in sepsis reviews.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2021
Same author

Moving Towards Common Data Elements and Core Outcome Measures in Frailty Research.

The Journal of frailty & aging·2020
Same author

When is a randomised controlled trial health equity relevant? Development and validation of a conceptual framework.

BMJ open·2017
Same author

Decision aids for patients considering total joint replacement: a cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2017
Same journal

GRAPPA 2019 Research Recipient Awards Report.

The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement·2021
Same journal

GRAPPA Treatment Recommendations: An Update From the 2020 GRAPPA Annual Meeting.

The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement·2021
Same journal

GRAPPA Patient Research Partner Network: Update to the GRAPPA 2020 Annual Meeting.

The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement·2021
Same journal

Instruments Measuring Physical Function for Psoriatic Arthritis Endorsed at GRAPPA 2020 Annual Meeting: Updates of the GRAPPA-OMERACT Working Group.

The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement·2021
Same journal

GRAPPA 2020 Update From the Education Committee.

The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement·2021
Same journal

The Role of Ultrasound in Research and Clinical Practice in Psoriatic Arthritis: Highlights From the GRAPPA Ultrasound Workshop.

The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement·2021
See all related articles

Selecting the right functional status assessment is challenging due to instrument variability. A new checklist aids in comparing and evaluating these important patient assessment tools.

Area of Science:

  • Health Assessment Tools
  • Patient Outcomes Measurement
  • Clinical Evaluation Instruments

Background:

  • Numerous functional status assessments exist, complicating clinical selection.
  • Instruments differ significantly in content, detail, scale type, and administration time.
  • Varying levels of reliability and validity testing exist across available instruments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the difficulty in selecting appropriate functional status assessments.
  • To provide a structured method for comparing and evaluating assessment instruments.
  • To aid clinicians in choosing the most suitable tools for patient evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a comparative checklist for functional status assessments.
  • Evaluation criteria focused on instrument content, detail, scale, administration length, reliability, and validity.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Systematic comparison of available functional status assessment instruments.

    • Main Results:

    • The developed checklist provides a framework for assessing instrument utility.
    • Identified key differentiating factors among functional status assessments.
    • Facilitates a more informed selection process for clinicians.

    Conclusions:

    • The checklist enhances the ability to compare and evaluate functional status assessment instruments.
    • A systematic approach can simplify the selection of appropriate tools.
    • Improved instrument selection can lead to more accurate patient status evaluation.