Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Protein Networks02:26

Protein Networks

4.1K
An organism can have thousands of different proteins, and these proteins must cooperate to ensure the health of an organism. Proteins bind to other proteins and form complexes to carry out their functions. Many proteins interact with multiple other proteins creating a complex network of protein interactions.
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
4.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) in medical research: applications, opportunities, and challenges.

Chinese medicine·2026
Same author

ToxiSpecies: Task-Aware Meta-Learning for Cross-Species Modeling of Acute Chemical Toxicity under Distribution Shift.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same author

Generative pretraining for drug molecule design with bidirectional structure-property optimization.

Communications chemistry·2026
Same author

Genome-guided generative adversarial learning enables nanopore adaptive sequencing.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Fusicoccane glycosides from the endophytic fungus Talaromyces sp. DC-26.

Phytochemistry·2026
Same author

ToxiGuard: an AOP-guided mechanistically interpretable framework for multi-organ toxicity prediction.

Archives of toxicology·2026
Same journal

Literature-informed gene extraction and ranking for multimodal data fusion.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SA-MTP: a structure-aware framework for multifunctional therapeutic peptide annotation.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Genome assemblies and annotations are not static and need support for tracking their evolution.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

A historical journey of metabolite-protein interaction discovery: from data harmonization to AI-driven prediction.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Bridging local-global transmembrane protein contexts with contrastive pretraining for alignment-free pathogenicity prediction.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Prediction of drug hypersensitivity by comprehensive modeling of HLA-peptidomes.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 28, 2025

A Data Integration Workflow to Identify Drug Combinations Targeting Synthetic Lethal Interactions
07:40

A Data Integration Workflow to Identify Drug Combinations Targeting Synthetic Lethal Interactions

Published on: May 27, 2021

4.3K

Computational methods, databases and tools for synthetic lethality prediction.

Jing Wang1, Qinglong Zhang1, Junshan Han1

  • 1Department of Bioinformatics, Institute of Health Service and Transfusion Medicine, Beijing 100850, China.

Briefings in Bioinformatics
|March 30, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Synthetic lethality (SL) pairs are crucial for targeted cancer therapy. This review explores computational methods and databases to efficiently identify these gene pairs, accelerating drug discovery.

Keywords:
computational methodsdeep learningmachine learningsynthetic lethality

More Related Videos

Dual CRISPR-Interference Strategy for Targeting Synthetic Lethal Interactions Between Non-Coding RNAs in Cancer Cells
07:23

Dual CRISPR-Interference Strategy for Targeting Synthetic Lethal Interactions Between Non-Coding RNAs in Cancer Cells

Published on: May 30, 2025

685
Implementation of In Vitro Drug Resistance Assays: Maximizing the Potential for Uncovering Clinically Relevant Resistance Mechanisms
08:46

Implementation of In Vitro Drug Resistance Assays: Maximizing the Potential for Uncovering Clinically Relevant Resistance Mechanisms

Published on: December 9, 2015

10.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 28, 2025

A Data Integration Workflow to Identify Drug Combinations Targeting Synthetic Lethal Interactions
07:40

A Data Integration Workflow to Identify Drug Combinations Targeting Synthetic Lethal Interactions

Published on: May 27, 2021

4.3K
Dual CRISPR-Interference Strategy for Targeting Synthetic Lethal Interactions Between Non-Coding RNAs in Cancer Cells
07:23

Dual CRISPR-Interference Strategy for Targeting Synthetic Lethal Interactions Between Non-Coding RNAs in Cancer Cells

Published on: May 30, 2025

685
Implementation of In Vitro Drug Resistance Assays: Maximizing the Potential for Uncovering Clinically Relevant Resistance Mechanisms
08:46

Implementation of In Vitro Drug Resistance Assays: Maximizing the Potential for Uncovering Clinically Relevant Resistance Mechanisms

Published on: December 9, 2015

10.7K

Area of Science:

  • Genetics and Genomics
  • Computational Biology
  • Cancer Therapeutics

Background:

  • Synthetic lethality (SL) is a genetic interaction where simultaneous inactivation of two genes leads to cell death, while individual inactivation is tolerated.
  • SL-based therapies, exemplified by PARP inhibitors, represent a significant advancement in targeted cancer treatment.
  • Identifying robust SL pairs is critical for expanding these therapies, but experimental screening is limited by the vast number of gene combinations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review computational methods for predicting synthetic lethality (SL) pairs.
  • To summarize relevant data resources and highlight the application of various computational approaches.
  • To discuss challenges and future directions in computational SL prediction for cancer therapy.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on synthetic lethality (SL) screening and prediction.
  • Summary of data resources and databases relevant to SL pair identification.
  • Categorization and elaboration of computational prediction methods, including statistical, network-based, classical machine learning, and deep learning approaches, with a focus on negative sampling.

Main Results:

  • Computational methods significantly complement experimental approaches by reducing the search space for SL pairs.
  • Various computational strategies, from statistical to deep learning, have been applied to predict SL interactions.
  • The review consolidates information on SL-related data, prediction tools, and methodologies.

Conclusions:

  • Computational prediction is essential for efficient identification of synthetic lethality (SL) pairs, accelerating the development of targeted cancer therapies.
  • Further development of computational models and integration of diverse data sources are needed to improve prediction accuracy.
  • Addressing challenges in negative sampling and model interpretability will be key for future advancements in SL-based drug discovery.