Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 22, 2025

Measurements of CO2 Fluxes at Non-Ideal Eddy Covariance Sites
Published on: June 24, 2019
Improved estimation of global gross primary productivity during 1981-2020 using the optimized P model
Zhenyu Zhang1, Xiaoyu Li2, Weimin Ju3
1International Institute of Earth System Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China; School of Geography and Ocean Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China; State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, Zhejiang, China; Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographic Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023, China.
A new P model accurately estimates global gross primary productivity (GPP), outperforming existing methods. This enhanced GPP dataset (PGPP) provides crucial data for carbon exchange studies.
Area of Science:
- Earth and Environmental Sciences
- Ecology
- Biogeochemistry
Background:
- Accurate terrestrial gross primary productivity (GPP) estimation is vital for understanding global carbon cycling.
- Light use efficiency (LUE) models are common for GPP estimation but face challenges with maximum LUE (LUEmax) determination and downregulation.
- The P model, a photosynthesis-based model, offers improved mechanistic understanding and simplified parameterization compared to traditional LUE models.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of five water stress factors within the P model for global GPP estimation.
- To develop and validate a new long-term global monthly GPP dataset (PGPP) using the optimized P model.
- To compare the performance of the new PGPP dataset against existing GPP products.
Main Methods:
- The P model was optimized by comparing the effectiveness of five integrated water stress factors.
- A new global monthly GPP dataset (PGPP) was generated at a 0.1° × 0.1° resolution for the period 1981-2020.
- The PGPP dataset was validated using data from 109 globally distributed FLUXNET sites.
Main Results:
- The optimized P model demonstrated superior performance in estimating GPP.
- Validation showed PGPP outperformed three widely-used GPP products, with R² = 0.75, RMSE = 1.77 g C m⁻² d⁻¹, and MAE = 1.28 g C m⁻² d⁻¹.
- Analysis revealed a significant increase in PGPP across 69.02% of global vegetated regions between 1981 and 2020.
Conclusions:
- The PGPP dataset offers a valuable new resource for global ecological research and carbon cycle studies.
- The comparison of water stress factors provides insights for future improvements in GPP modeling.
- The P model shows promise for accurate global GPP estimation, advancing our understanding of terrestrial ecosystem responses.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Primary Production
Estimation of the Physical Quantities
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Physiological Models
Microbial Growth Measurement: Indirect Methods
Microbial Growth Measurement: Direct Methods
Global Climate Change

