Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 2, 2025

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Consensus-Based Development of an Assessment Tool: A Methodology for Patient Engagement in Primary Care and CPD
Ethan Lin1, Jeanne Gobraeil, Sharon Johnston
1Lin : Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Dr. Gobraeil: Cardiovascular Health in Ambulatory Care Research Team, Summer Studentship, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Dr. Johnston: C.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, and Institut du Savoir, Montfort Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario,Canada. Dr. Venables: C.T. Lamont Primary Care Research Centre, Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Dr. Archibald: C.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, and Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract:
With cardiovascular disease (CVD) posing a significant disease burden in Canada and more broadly, preventative efforts which incorporate best evidence, patient preference, and physician expertise must continue to take place. Primary care providers play a pivotal role in this effort, and a greater understanding of patient perspectives is needed to guide management and inform training. We used a validated consensus method, the nominal group technique (NGT), to identify patient-reported experience measures (PREM) related to CVD prevention deemed most important by both patients and providers. The NGT was used by using structured discussions between patients and providers to bring ideas about PREM CVD outcomes to a consensus. Four patient partners and four primary care providers were selected to participate in an NGT session. Each participant wrote down items/questions they believed important in CVD preventative care. After discussions, all items underwent anonymous ranking on a 5-point scale. Items were included/excluded based on 75% agreement a priori. The panel produced 10 items from a total of 26 after 2 rounds of ranking. The top two items were as follows: "Is your treatment plan tailored to you" and "Was your physician good at giving information about your risk factors?" These results are significantly different compared with existing quality measures because they highlight aspects of patient experience and therapeutic relationship. A questionnaire consisting of prioritized PREM items is valuable in quality improvement and continuous professional development (CPD).
Related Concept Videos
Patient-centered Care
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching I: Assessment and Diagnosis
It is critical to determine the patient's learning needs during the assessment. Determination of learning needs compounds data...
Nursing Assessment
The nurse collects all aspects of the patient's health in the initial assessment, establishing priorities for ongoing focused assessments...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...

