Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 2, 2025

10:42
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
6.6K
Cleft Lip Repair Competence Can Be Evaluated with High-fidelity Simulation
Carolyn R Rogers-Vizena1,2,3, Caroline A Yao4,5, Georgios D Sideridis3,6
1Department of Plastic and Oral Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Global Open
|August 4, 2022
Summary
A high-fidelity cleft lip simulator effectively differentiates surgical training levels. This tool, combined with specific assessment metrics, accurately evaluates procedural competence in cleft lip repair, unlike simple marking or symmetry measures.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Education
- Medical Simulation
- Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery
Background:
- Assessing surgical competency before independent practice is crucial.
- High-fidelity simulators offer a potential solution for objective performance evaluation.
- This study investigated the utility of a cleft lip simulator for assessing procedural competence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test if a high-fidelity cleft lip simulator can discriminate performance across surgical training levels.
- To evaluate the simulator's utility for assessing procedural competence in cleft lip repair.
Main Methods:
- A prospective cohort study involving 26 participants (postgraduate year 3 to craniofacial fellow).
- Participants performed unilateral cleft lip repair on a high-fidelity simulator.
- Videos were blindly assessed using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) and the Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair Competency Assessment Tool (UCLR).
- Digital symmetry measurements were taken, and correlations with training level and experience were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Training level showed the strongest correlation with the UCLR (R = 0.4842, P = 0.0122) compared to OSATS (R = 0.3645, P = 0.0671).
- Specific UCLR subscores for performance and result correlated significantly with training level (R = 0.5152, P = 0.0071 and R = 0.4226, P = 0.0315, respectively).
- Cumulative experience had weak correlations with assessment scores, and symmetry measures showed a weak correlation with training level.
Conclusions:
- High-fidelity simulation combined with a procedure-specific tool (UCLR) demonstrates construct validity for evaluating cleft lip repair performance.
- The ability to simply mark the repair or the final symmetry are not accurate independent assessment methods.
- This approach provides a reliable method for assessing surgical trainees' competence in cleft lip repair.

