Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

14.8K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.8K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

28.2K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
28.2K
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

40.8K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.8K
Nonconscious Mimicry01:13

Nonconscious Mimicry

4.6K
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
4.6K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

23.7K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.7K
Attribution Theory00:56

Attribution Theory

13.3K
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).
13.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Politeness cannot make up for robots' errors.

Frontiers in robotics and AI·2026
Same author

Automatic Root Length Estimation from Images Acquired In Situ without Segmentation.

Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)·2024
Same author

Later Life as a Daring Experience: Factors Associated with Older Adults' Risk Perception.

Journal of gerontological social work·2023
Same author

Early Detection of Grapevine (<i>Vitis vinifera</i>) Downy Mildew (<i>Peronospora</i>) and Diurnal Variations Using Thermal Imaging.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

Robotic System for Physical Training of Older Adults.

International journal of social robotics·2020
Same author

Innovation in Later Life: A Study of Grandmothers and Facebook.

International journal of aging & human development·2020
Same journal

TICK: A Knowledge Processing Infrastructure for Cognitive Trust in Human-Robot Interaction.

International journal of social robotics·2025
Same journal

Sonic Sleight of Hand: Sound Induces Illusory Distortions in the Perception and Prediction of Robot Action.

International journal of social robotics·2025
Same journal

Enhancing Robotic Collaborative Tasks Through Contextual Human Motion Prediction and Intention Inference.

International journal of social robotics·2025
Same journal

Coping with Emotional Distress via Self-Disclosure to Robots: An Intervention with Caregivers.

International journal of social robotics·2025
Same journal

The Social Triad Model: Considering the Deployer in a Novel Approach to Trust in Human-Robot Interaction.

International journal of social robotics·2025
Same journal

Robot-Mediated Nudges for Workplace Health: Not a One-Size-Fits-All Modeling Problem.

International journal of social robotics·2024
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 31, 2025

SSVEP-based Experimental Procedure for Brain-Robot Interaction with Humanoid Robots
11:01

SSVEP-based Experimental Procedure for Brain-Robot Interaction with Humanoid Robots

Published on: November 24, 2015

13.2K

Politeness in Human-Robot Interaction: A Multi-Experiment Study with Non-Humanoid Robots.

Shikhar Kumar1, Eliran Itzhak1, Yael Edan1

  • 1Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ben-Gurion University of Negev, Be'er Sheva, Israel.

International Journal of Social Robotics
|August 23, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Polite robots enhance human-robot interaction, increasing user enjoyment and trust. Older adults showed more trust in polite robots than younger adults, with live interactions yielding better results.

Keywords:
Assistive robotHuman Robot interactionOlder adultsPolitenessSocial assistive robot

More Related Videos

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

17.4K
One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence
14:05

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence

Published on: December 15, 2010

27.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 31, 2025

SSVEP-based Experimental Procedure for Brain-Robot Interaction with Humanoid Robots
11:01

SSVEP-based Experimental Procedure for Brain-Robot Interaction with Humanoid Robots

Published on: November 24, 2015

13.2K
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

17.4K
One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence
14:05

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence

Published on: December 15, 2010

27.5K

Area of Science:

  • Human-Robot Interaction
  • Social Robotics
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Politeness theory, established by Lakoff, provides a framework for understanding social interactions.
  • Non-humanoid robots are increasingly integrated into daily life, necessitating research into their social behavior.
  • Understanding user perceptions of robot politeness is crucial for designing effective and acceptable human-robot interactions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of varying politeness levels in non-humanoid robots on user perceptions.
  • To evaluate user responses to robot politeness across different robot types, user demographics, and interaction conditions.
  • To determine if users can distinguish between different levels of robot politeness.

Main Methods:

  • Eight studies were conducted manipulating three levels of robot politeness using a table-setting task.
  • Two robot types (robotic manipulator, mobile robot) and two populations (old and young adults) were used.
  • Interaction conditions included live and video, with user perceptions of enjoyment, satisfaction, and trust measured.

Main Results:

  • Polite robot behavior significantly improved user perceptions of the interaction, including enjoyment, satisfaction, and trust.
  • Participants could differentiate between the designed politeness levels of the robots.
  • Older adults reported higher trust in polite robots compared to younger adults. Live interactions led to greater enjoyment and trust than video conditions. Mobile robots elicited higher satisfaction than manipulator robots.

Conclusions:

  • Implementing politeness in non-humanoid robots positively influences user experience and interaction quality.
  • Robot politeness is a perceivable and impactful feature, varying across user groups and interaction modalities.
  • Designers should consider politeness strategies, robot embodiment, and interaction context to optimize human-robot collaboration.