Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Theta band activity during event-file retrieval is influenced by stimulus salience in the preceding action episode.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026

Same author

Perception and action as one: Re-integrating research on human action through event files.

Psychological review·2026

Same author

Binding and retrieval of omitted responses in complex response sequences.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026

Same author

From prediction to control: Age-related dissociations between implicit regularity encoding and attentional modulation during perception-action integration.

Developmental cognitive neuroscience·2026

Same author

A Multiplexed Neural Code Governs Dynamic Perception-Action Reconfiguration during Response Inhibition.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026

Same author

The sound of silence: Binding and retrieval of silence in distractor-response binding.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026

Same journal

EXPRESS: The Effect of Response-code on Stroop Interference and Facilitation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026

Same journal

EXPRESS: When illusion rivals reality. Investigating error detection and the role of working memory resources in the Vanishing Ball Illusion.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026

Same journal

EXPRESS: Metaphors and the Body: Perceived Locations for the Self are Influenced by Conceptual Metaphor.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026

Same journal

EXPRESS: Age-related Differences in Recognition Memory for Discourse: The Case of Modified Words, Competitors, and Related Lures.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026

Same journal

EXPRESS: Exaggerated Self-Referencing in Body Dysmorphic Disorder.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026

Same journal

EXPRESS: Post-Error Adjustments: The role of Response Stimulus Intervals and error placement.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

Binding of task-irrelevant contextual features in task switching.

Elena Benini¹, Iring Koch¹, Susanne Mayr²

¹Cognitive and Experimental Psychology, Institute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)

|September 16, 2022

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Repeating task-irrelevant context features improves performance in cued task switching, especially when task and response repeat. This binding and retrieval mechanism enhances cognitive control.

Keywords:

Task switching context features episodic retrieval response-repetition effects

More Related Videos

Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies

Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies

Published on: September 22, 2014

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies

Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies

Published on: September 22, 2014

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Attention and Action Control

Background:

Feature binding is crucial for attention and action control.
Task-irrelevant context features can influence cognitive processes.
Cued task switching paradigms are used to study cognitive control.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the binding of task-irrelevant context features in cued task switching.
To determine if repeating context features influences performance based on feature matching.
To understand how context feature binding modulates response repetition benefits.

Main Methods:

Two experiments (N=124; N=96) with different tasks and materials were conducted.
Participants performed cued task switching with varying context features.
Context feature timing (synchronous vs. delayed) and location (cue vs. target) were manipulated.

Main Results:

Repeating task-irrelevant context improved performance when task and response repeated.
This benefit was observed only when context features were synchronous with cue onset or part of the cue.
Delayed context features or context features as part of the target did not yield the same performance improvement.

Conclusions:

Binding and retrieval of task-irrelevant features play a significant role in task switching.
These processes modulate response repetition benefits, particularly in task repetitions.
The findings enhance understanding of how irrelevant contextual information influences cognitive control mechanisms.