Development of electrical power transmission system linear hybrid state estimator based on circuit analysis...

Electrical power systems are in rapid evolution, necessitating advanced monitoring, control, and protection aspects connected to an accurate knowledge of the state of the grid. State estimation is one-way such knowledge could be achieved by estimating voltage magnitudes and phase angles at all buses in electrical networks. Electric utilities are deploying advanced Phasor Measurement Units (PMUs) in grids with conventional Remote Terminal Units (RTUs). Integrating measurements from the two types of devices for state estimation is inevitable. In the past, hybrid state estimators have been based on nonlinear models associated with various challenges, such as using nonlinear state estimation algorithms with high computational time, slow convergence, and initialization problems. For this reason, there is a need to develop hybrid linear mathematical models that eliminate issues posed by nonlinearity models. This paper presents a novel mathematical formulation that gives a linear measurement model for hybrid state estimation based on the standard steady-state branch model. The developed model is then tested in MATLAB using three standard transmission test cases (IEEE 14-BUS, IEEE 30-BUS, and IEEE 57-BUS) with available measurements subjected to different errors. Notably, the performance of the developed model based on two different state estimation algorithms, Weighted Least Square (WLS) and Weighted Least Absolute Value (WLAV), are compared. The simulation results obtained for voltage magnitudes and phase angles for all buses in the three scenarios compare well with reference values. Using Normalized Cumulative Error (NCE) as a performance index, the developed linear measurement model gives less cumulative error than the conventional nonlinear model. With measurements subjected to bad data (such as negative values for measured variables), the developed model performs better using WLAV than the WLS estimation algorithm. The computational time for all three networks is notably less when using the WLAV algorithm than the WLS algorithm.