Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2025

11:54
Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles
Published on: March 13, 2017
9.4K
Performance of digital morphology analyzer CellaVision DC-1.
Gun-Hyuk Lee1, Sumi Yoon2, Minjeong Nam3
1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
|October 28, 2022
Summary
The CellaVision DC-1 digital morphology analyzer demonstrates excellent precision and specificity for blood cell analysis in small labs. While reliable for assisting peripheral blood smear review, it may increase workload for certain cell types.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Medical Technology
Background:
- Digital morphology analyzers are increasingly used in clinical laboratories.
- The CellaVision DC-1 is a new system designed for small to medium-volume laboratories.
- Comprehensive performance evaluation is crucial for adopting new diagnostic tools.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the precision, qualitative performance, cell counting accuracy, and turnaround time (TAT) of the CellaVision DC-1.
- To assess the suitability of the DC-1 for peripheral blood smear (PBS) review in resource-limited settings.
Main Methods:
- Performance was assessed using peripheral blood smear slides according to CLSI guidelines (EP15-A3, EP15-Ed3-IG1, EP12-A2).
- Cell counts from DC-1 were compared against manual counting using CLSI guideline EP 09C-ED3.
- Turnaround time (TAT) for DC-1 was compared with manual slide review.
Main Results:
- DC-1 exhibited excellent precision (%CV: 0.0-3.5%) and high specificity (98.9-100.0%) across 18 cell classes.
- High negative predictive value (98.4-100.0%) was observed.
- However, zero positive predictive value was noted for seven specific cell types, including blasts and nucleated red blood cells.
- The largest absolute mean difference between DC-1 and manual counts was 2.74%.
- Total TAT was comparable: 8:55 for DC-1 and 8:55 for manual counting.
Conclusions:
- The CellaVision DC-1 shows reliable performance for assisting peripheral blood smear review in small to medium-volume labs.
- Its precision and specificity support its use, but limitations exist for certain cell classes.
- The system may generate additional workload for verification of specific cell types, requiring careful workflow integration.

