Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

1.7K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
1.7K
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

3.5K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
3.5K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

273
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
273
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

2.0K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
2.0K
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

2.6K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n)  to the number of categories (k).
2.6K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

260
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
260

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparative Genomic and Microenvironmental Profiles of Hereditary and Sporadic TNBC in Colombian Women.

Biology·2025
Same author

Long Noncoding RNA TALAM1 Is a Transcriptional Target of the RUNX2 Transcription Factor in Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Current issues in molecular biology·2023
Same author

Lung Cancer Gene Regulatory Network of Transcription Factors Related to the Hallmarks of Cancer.

Current issues in molecular biology·2023
Same author

Identification of the Transcriptional Regulatory Role of RUNX2 by Network Analysis in Lung Cancer Cells.

Biomedicines·2022
Same author

Uncovering anthocyanin diversity in potato landraces (Solanum tuberosum L. Phureja) using RNA-seq.

PloS one·2022
Same author

Identifying General Tumor and Specific Lung Cancer Biomarkers by Transcriptomic Analysis.

Biology·2022
Same journal

FAM122A inhibition of PP2A-B55 through a bipartite binding mechanism.

Journal of cell science·2026
Same journal

Disentangling the response to lysosomal damage.

Journal of cell science·2026
Same journal

The force, form and function of the nucleus.

Journal of cell science·2026
Same journal

The nucleus-vacuole junction at a glance.

Journal of cell science·2026
Same journal

Loss of INPP5E affects photoreceptor outer segment membrane biogenesis in iPSC-derived human retinal organoids.

Journal of cell science·2026
Same journal

Brinker regulates reciprocal outcomes of BMP signal between stem cells and differentiating cells.

Journal of cell science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 18, 2025

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

176

Prog-Plot - a visual method to determine functional relationships for false discovery rate regression methods.

Nicolás Bello1, Liliana López-Kleine1

  • 1Statistics Department, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Ciudad Universitaria, Cra 30 No 45-03, Bogotá 111321, Colombia.

Journal of Cell Science
|December 9, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) in gene expression analysis requires accurate P-value corrections. We introduce Progressive proportions plot (Prog-Plot) for objectively specifying regression models in FDR analysis.

Keywords:
Differential expressionFalse discovery rateGenomicsRNA-Seq

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Emerging Technologies and Advanced Tools for Decoding Metabolomics Data Analysis
07:11

Author Spotlight: Emerging Technologies and Advanced Tools for Decoding Metabolomics Data Analysis

Published on: November 10, 2023

2.6K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

16.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 18, 2025

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

176
Author Spotlight: Emerging Technologies and Advanced Tools for Decoding Metabolomics Data Analysis
07:11

Author Spotlight: Emerging Technologies and Advanced Tools for Decoding Metabolomics Data Analysis

Published on: November 10, 2023

2.6K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

16.9K

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Statistical Genetics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Multiple test corrections are crucial in differential gene expression analysis to manage the false discovery rate (FDR).
  • Current P-value correction methods increasingly use regression models incorporating covariates to enhance test power.
  • Specifying these regression models often relies on subjective prior knowledge, lacking objective validation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present Progressive proportions plot (Prog-Plot), a novel visual tool for identifying the relationship between covariates and P-value proportions.
  • To provide an objective method for specifying regression models used in P-value correction for FDR control.
  • To move beyond reliance on prior knowledge for regression model selection in FDR analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Development of the Progressive proportions plot (Prog-Plot) visualization technique.
  • Application of Prog-Plot to assess the relationship between covariates and the proportion of P-values under the null hypothesis.
  • Utilizing Prog-Plot to inform the objective specification of regression models for P-value correction.

Main Results:

  • Prog-Plot effectively visualizes the functional relationship between covariates and the proportion of P-values consistent with the null hypothesis.
  • The tool enables objective assessment of covariate relevance for P-value correction models.
  • Demonstrates a data-driven approach to regression model selection, improving upon subjective methods.

Conclusions:

  • Prog-Plot offers a valuable, objective visual tool for enhancing P-value correction methods in differential gene expression studies.
  • This approach facilitates more accurate FDR control by enabling informed regression model specification.
  • The method reduces reliance on prior assumptions, promoting reproducible and robust statistical analysis.