Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cervical spinal cord stimulation disrupts proprioception yet improves voluntary arm reaching.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

A systematic investigation reveals dissociable effects of ageing on implicit and explicit components of sensorimotor learning.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same author

Minimal Impact of Low Vision on Explicit Sensorimotor Adaptation.

Neurorehabilitation and neural repair·2026
Same author

How to conduct behavioural experiments online.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same author

Cerebellar contributions to action and cognition: Prediction, timescale, and continuity.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Motor biases reflect a misalignment between visual and proprioceptive reference frames.

eLife·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 10, 2025

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior
05:05

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior

Published on: December 2, 2022

1.7K

Signatures of contextual interference in implicit sensorimotor adaptation.

Jonathan S Tsay1,2, Carolyn Irving1, Richard B Ivry1,2

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|February 14, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Contextual interference impacts motor skill learning. Random practice schedules enhance long-term retention of implicit motor skill adaptation, unlike blocked schedules.

Keywords:
contextual interferenceerror-based learningmotor learningvisuomotor adaptation

More Related Videos

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

8.6K
Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation
12:33

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Published on: December 31, 2013

9.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 10, 2025

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior
05:05

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior

Published on: December 2, 2022

1.7K
The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

8.6K
Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation
12:33

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Published on: December 31, 2013

9.0K

Area of Science:

  • Motor Learning
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Contextual interference describes how practice schedules affect motor skill acquisition.
  • Blocked practice leads to faster initial learning but poorer long-term retention.
  • Its effect on implicit adaptation of overlearned skills is not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if contextual interference applies to implicit motor skill recalibration.
  • To compare blocked versus random practice in a visuomotor rotation task isolating implicit adaptation.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments using a visuomotor rotation task.
  • Participants trained under blocked or random practice schedules.
  • Implicit adaptation assessed via performance changes and retention tests.

Main Results:

  • Random practice resulted in slower initial learning but significantly better retention compared to blocked practice.
  • This effect persisted even when controlling for changes in practice context between training and assessment.

Conclusions:

  • Contextual interference influences implicit adaptation of motor skills, not just acquisition of new skills.
  • Random practice schedules are beneficial for the long-term retention of implicit motor adaptations.