Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

165
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
165
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.4K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.4K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.5K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.5K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.1K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

5.6K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.6K
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques II01:23

Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques II

64
Personality types, particularly Type A and Type B, significantly influence how individuals respond to stress. These personality distinctions are marked by varying levels of ambition, competitiveness, and coping styles, all of which shape an individual's resilience to stressors.
Type A Personality: Driven and Easily Stressed
Individuals with Type A personalities are often highly competitive and ambitious and operate with a strong sense of urgency. Commonly labeled as...
64

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sequential information preferences in uncertain decision making.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same author

Planning-to-binge: Time allocation for future media consumption.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2023
Same author

The unlikelihood effect: When knowing more creates the perception of less.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2022
Same author

Category Congruence of Display-Only Products Influences Attention and Purchase Decisions.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2021
Same author

Dissociable components of the reward circuit are involved in appraisal versus choice.

Scientific reports·2019
Same author

The evil of banality: When choosing between the mundane feels like choosing between the worst.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2018
Same journal

How the brain represents a romantic partner: Dissociable roles of the nucleus accumbens and anterior insula.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Predictive processing in time perception: Assessing prediction error minimization in the sub-second range.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

When attention falters: Brain, breathing, and behavioral signals of lapses in interoceptive attention.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Fronto-Parietal EEG asymmetry interactions predict negative attention bias: A secondary data analysis.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Correction: The neural basis of cost-benefit trade-offs in effort investment: a quantitative activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

The influence of effort expenditure on the neurophysiological substrates of reward processing in early adolescence.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 9, 2025

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.1K

Gender differences in "optimistic" information processing in uncertain decisions.

Uma R Karmarkar1

  • 1Rady School of Management, School of Global Policy and Strategy, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive #0553, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0553, USA. ukarmarkar@ucsd.edu.

Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience
|February 23, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Men and women value uncertain financial prospects differently, with men showing an enhanced optimism bias and greater value increase with perceived winning likelihood. This gender difference in risk processing impacts decision-making under ambiguity.

Keywords:
AmbiguityDecision-makingGenderInformation processingRiskUncertainty

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

781
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 9, 2025

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.1K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

781
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Decision-making under uncertainty involves risk (known probabilities) and ambiguity (unknown probabilities and outcomes).
  • Prior research on gender differences in risk evaluation is mixed, especially concerning ambiguity.
  • Existing studies often focus on missing information, but this research examines how present information is used.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how individuals assign value to uncertain financial prospects based on available partial information.
  • To examine gender differences in the influence of favorable and unfavorable information on subjective value.
  • To explore the role of risk processing and risk preferences in these gender-based valuation differences.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental design involving participants evaluating ambiguous financial prospects with partial information.
  • Analysis of how favorable and unfavorable information impacts subjective value assignment.
  • Measurement of participants' risk processing, including estimated likelihood of winning and certainty, and risk preferences.

Main Results:

  • No main effect of gender on overall value was observed.
  • Male participants exhibited an enhanced optimism bias, with greater influence of favorable/unfavorable information on subjective value compared to females.
  • An interaction between gender and risk preferences showed value increased more with perceived winning likelihood for males, a finding replicated with objective probabilities.

Conclusions:

  • Gender influences how individuals process information and assign value in uncertain financial decisions, particularly through optimism bias and risk preferences.
  • Risk processing mechanisms contribute significantly to observed gender differences in subjective valuation under ambiguity.
  • The relationship between subjective value and risk operates similarly across different levels of uncertainty, including objective probabilities.