Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2025

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration
Published on: November 16, 2018
Polydioxanone Membrane Compared with Collagen Membrane for Bone Regeneration.
Lilian Caldas Quirino1, Pedro Henrique de Azambuja Carvalho1, Renato Torres Augusto Neto1
1Department of Diagnosis and Surgery, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rua Humaitá 1680, Araraquara CEP 14801-903, SP, Brazil.
The synthetic polydioxanone membrane (Plenum® Guide) effectively supports guided bone regeneration, showing promising results in promoting bone repair in rat calvaria defects. This synthetic option demonstrates comparable efficacy to traditional collagen membranes.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Regenerative Medicine
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Background:
- Guided bone regeneration (GBR) utilizes membranes to promote osteopromotion.
- Polydioxanone membranes offer a synthetic alternative with established medical and dental applications.
- Evaluating novel synthetic membranes is crucial for advancing GBR techniques.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of a synthetic polydioxanone membrane (Plenum® Guide) with a collagen-based membrane (Bio-Gide®) for guided bone regeneration.
- To assess bone repair in critical-sized defects in rat calvaria using these membranes.
- To evaluate the osteoconductive potential of the synthetic membrane in conjunction with a bone graft substitute.
Main Methods:
- Critical-sized bone defects were created in rat calvaria.
- Defects were treated with either Plenum® Guide or Bio-Gide® membranes, combined with Plenum® Osshp bone graft.
- Analyses included immunohistochemistry (RUNX2, OPN), gene expression (RUNX2, IBSP, VEGF), histometry, and micro-CT at multiple time points (7, 15, 30, 60 days).
Main Results:
- The Plenum® Guide group exhibited enhanced immunolabeling for RUNX2 and OPN, and higher gene expression of VEGF and IBSP compared to the Bio-Gide® group.
- Histometric analysis revealed no significant differences in connective tissue, neoformed bone, or remaining biomaterial percentages between the groups.
- Micro-CT analysis also showed no statistically significant differences in bone regeneration between the two membrane types.
Conclusions:
- The synthetic polydioxanone membrane (Plenum® Guide) is an effective option for guided bone regeneration.
- Plenum® Guide demonstrates comparable bone repair outcomes to the collagen-based Bio-Gide® membrane.
- The synthetic membrane shows potential for use in bone regeneration applications, offering a viable alternative to existing materials.
More Related Videos
10:49Doxycycline Loaded Collagen-Chitosan Composite Scaffold for the Accelerated Healing of Diabetic Wounds
Published on: August 21, 2021
09:35Distinctive Capillary Action by Micro-channels in Bone-like Templates can Enhance Recruitment of Cells for Restoration of Large Bony Defect
Published on: September 11, 2015