Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

568
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
568
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

610
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
610
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

748
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
748
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

4.2K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
4.2K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.5K
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

528
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
528

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Self-transcendence accompanies aesthetic chills.

PLOS mental health·2026
Same author

Predicting individual differences in peak emotional response.

PNAS nexus·2024
Same author

Preventing antisocial robots: A pathway to artificial empathy.

Science robotics·2023
Same author

Decoding Task-Based fMRI Data with Graph Neural Networks, Considering Individual Differences.

Brain sciences·2022
Same author

Sex differences in somatomotor representations of others' pain: a permutation-based analysis.

Brain structure & function·2018
Same journal

Are language models models?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Large language models illuminate the mechanistic underpinnings of the creative aspect of language use (CALU), long regarded as a mystery.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

LLMs as a platform for studying constraint interaction: Motivation and challenges.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Beyond the data gap: Children create languages, violate their input statistics, and exhibit critical periods.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Not-so-strange love: Language models and generative linguistic theories are more compatible than they appear.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Rich data drive generalization: Lessons from machine learning for linguistics and cognitive science.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 31, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K

Hierarchical Bayesian narrative-making under variable uncertainty.

Alex Jinich-Diamant1,2, Leonardo Christov-Moore2,3

  • 1Department of Anesthesiology, Department of Cognitive Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0515, USAaljinich@ucsd.edu.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|May 8, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Hierarchically nested Bayesian models offer a more mechanistic explanation for decision-making than Conviction Narrative Theory. This approach integrates affect into a precision-weighted mechanism, adjusting for uncertainty and influencing narrative versus sensory dependence.

More Related Videos

Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline
10:44

Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.2K
A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types
12:39

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

Published on: December 10, 2012

11.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 31, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K
Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline
10:44

Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.2K
A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types
12:39

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

Published on: December 10, 2012

11.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • Decision-Making Theory

Background:

  • Conviction Narrative Theory (CNT) critiques utility-based decision-making but oversimplifies probabilistic models and treats affect/narrative mechanistically.
  • Existing models often fail to provide a unified, biologically plausible mechanism for integrating emotional and narrative influences in decision-making.
  • Understanding how uncertainty modulates reliance on different information sources (narrative vs. sensory) is crucial for decision-making research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and elaborate on hierarchically nested Bayesian accounts as a superior alternative to CNT for explaining decision-making.
  • To present a mechanistically explicit and parsimonious model that incorporates affect into decision-making processes.
  • To demonstrate how this Bayesian framework accounts for the tuning of decision-making toward narrative or sensory dependence under varying uncertainty.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a hierarchically nested Bayesian framework.
  • Mechanistic modeling of affect integration via a precision-weighted mechanism.
  • Analysis of how varying uncertainty levels influence the balance between narrative and sensory information in decision-making.

Main Results:

  • The proposed Bayesian models offer a mechanistically explicit account of decision-making, addressing limitations of CNT.
  • Affect is integrated into a single, biologically plausible mechanism that dynamically adjusts decision-making strategies.
  • The model successfully demonstrates how uncertainty levels tune decision-making, favoring narrative or sensory input as appropriate.

Conclusions:

  • Hierarchically nested Bayesian accounts provide a parsimonious and mechanistically explicit framework for understanding decision-making.
  • This approach offers a unified mechanism for integrating affect, narrative, and sensory information under conditions of uncertainty.
  • The model advances decision-making theory by offering a biologically plausible explanation for adaptive strategy selection.