Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 28, 2025

Using Looming Visual Stimuli to Evaluate Mouse Vision
Published on: June 13, 2019
Exploring the impact of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response conflicts on computer mouse trajectories: continuous
Hayley Tseng1, Markus F Damian2
1School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, 12a Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TU, UK. ht15688@bristol.ac.uk.
Abstract:
In recent years, mouse tracking (designing experiments in which participants provide responses via dynamic computer mouse movements) has enjoyed increasing experience in experimental psychology. Mouse-tracking studies typically involve some form of stimulus-response (S-R) conflict, and S-R effects emerge in movement trajectories (as well as in latencies). By contrast, it is currently unclear how stimulus-stimulus (S-S) compatibility affects movements. Here, we used a spatial arrow task which allowed us to generate S-R and S-S effects within the same experiment. Experiment 1 clarified in a key press experiment that this manipulation generates clear S-S and S-R effects in latencies. More critically, Experiment 2 demonstrated that both types of conflict impact mouse trajectories with incompatibility emerging as increased 'curvature' of responses when compared to congruent responses. We argue that these results are best explained via the assumption of 'continuous flow' of information, from stimulus encoding to response preparation and finally into motor action. By contrast, the S-S effect on trajectories contradicts the notion that processing is 'thresholded' between stimulus encoding and response preparation.

