Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Language and Cognition01:27

Language and Cognition

375
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
375
Components of Language01:24

Components of Language

320
Language, whether spoken, signed, or written, consists of specific components: lexicon and grammar. The lexicon is the vocabulary of a language, comprising its words. Grammar is the set of rules used to convey meaning through the lexicon. For example, English grammar adds “-ed” to most verbs to indicate past tense. Words are formed by combining phonemes, which are the basic sound units of a language. Different languages have different sets of phonemes (e.g., “ah” vs.
320
Language Development01:22

Language Development

397
Children master language quickly and with relative ease, supported by both biological predisposition and reinforcement. B. F. Skinner (1957) proposed that language is learned through reinforcement, while Noam Chomsky (1965) argued that language acquisition mechanisms are biologically determined.
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
397
Lateralization01:28

Lateralization

364
Brain lateralization refers to the division of mental processes and functions between the two hemispheres of the brain, a phenomenon that optimizes neural efficiency and underpins complex abilities in humans. This specialization allows each hemisphere to perform tasks where it has a comparative advantage, facilitating more refined cognitive capabilities across different domains.
364
Interference: Path Lengths01:10

Interference: Path Lengths

1.3K
Consider two sources of sound, that may or may not be in phase, emitting waves at a single frequency, and consider the frequencies to be the same.
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
1.3K
Language01:16

Language

249
Language is a unique communication system that uses words and systematic rules to organize and transmit information. Unlike other forms of communication, which may involve postures, movements, odors, or vocalizations, language relies on symbols and grammar. This makes human communication distinct from that of other species, who also communicate but do not use language in the same way humans do.
Corballis and Suddendorf (2007) and Tomasello and Rakoczy (2003) highlight the role of language in...
249

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Voice quality research and statistical best practice (L).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

Cross-Linguistic Phonetic Variation in Bilingual Speech: Cantonese /n/ > [l] Merger in Early Cantonese-English Bilinguals.

Language and speech·2024
Same author

Receptive vocabulary predicts multilinguals' recognition skills in adverse listening conditions.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2023
Same author

Quantitative, not qualitative, differences in word classification errors as a function of language dominance.

JASA express letters·2023
Same author

The structure of acoustic voice variation in bilingual speech.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2023
Same author

Adaptation to Social-Linguistic Associations in Audio-Visual Speech.

Brain sciences·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 20, 2025

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

472

Language Contact Within the Speaker: Phonetic Variation and Crosslinguistic Influence.

Khia A Johnson1, Molly Babel1

  • 1Department of Linguistics, The University of British Columbia, Canada.

Language and Speech
|July 31, 2023
PubMed
Summary

In bilingual speech, the less variable language influences the more variable one. This study shows how phonetic variation in Cantonese affects English, impacting sound change.

Keywords:
Speech productionbilingualismcrosslinguistic influencepronunciation variationspontaneous speech corpus

More Related Videos

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

14.8K
Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
08:08

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

9.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 20, 2025

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

472
Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

14.8K
Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
08:08

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

9.4K

Area of Science:

  • Phonetics and Phonology
  • Bilingualism Studies
  • Sociolinguistics

Background:

  • Sound change models suggest variation distribution within speech communities influences change direction.
  • Bilingual speech offers a unique context to test how language interaction shapes phonetic variation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if the less variable language constrains phonetic variation in the more variable language within bilingual speakers.
  • To explore the impact of Cantonese phonetic distributions on English sound production in early Cantonese-English bilinguals.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of spontaneous speech corpora from early Cantonese-English bilinguals.
  • Comparison with monolingual English control corpora to identify cross-language influence.
  • Focus on phonetic features of stop obstruents, specifically voicing and release patterns.

Main Results:

  • Cantonese-English bilinguals produced intervocalic English /b d g/ with less voicing and word-final English /t k/ with less release compared to monolingual English speakers.
  • These patterns align with the phonetic distributions observed in Cantonese, where initial voicing is gradient but final stop release is prohibited.
  • Language mode (which language was active) did not significantly impact these observed phonetic patterns in bilinguals.

Conclusions:

  • Phonetic variation in cross-linguistically linked categories in bilingual speech is shaped by the phonetic variation distributions within each language.
  • This provides a mechanistic explanation for differential susceptibility to cross-language phonetic influence.
  • The findings support models of sound change driven by variation distribution, extended to the bilingual context.