Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2025

SSVEP-based Experimental Procedure for Brain-Robot Interaction with Humanoid Robots
Published on: November 24, 2015
Working with roubles and failures in conversation between humans and robots: workshop report.
Frank Förster1, Marta Romeo2,3, Patrick Holthaus1
1Department of Computer Science, School of Physics, Engineering and Computer Science, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
Researchers explored human-robot communication failures to improve robotic speech interfaces. A workshop identified key issues and proposed a benchmark scenario for future research and development.
Area of Science:
- Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)
- Computational Linguistics
- Cognitive Science
Background:
- Miscommunication in human-robot interaction (HRI) requires systematic study.
- Interdisciplinary collaboration is crucial for advancing HRI dialogue systems.
Purpose of the Study:
- Establish a network for investigating communicative failures in robotic speech interfaces.
- Map the landscape of human-robot communication failures.
- Define a benchmark scenario for testing HRI speech interfaces.
Main Methods:
- Organized an interdisciplinary workshop with experts from robotics, HRI, dialogue systems, conversation analysis, cognitive science, and linguistics.
- Surveyed the "failure landscape" of human-robot communication.
- Discussed and proposed a benchmark scenario for testing speech interfaces.
Main Results:
- Identified key challenges and areas of miscommunication in human-robot interactions.
- Outlined a "failure landscape" specific to robotic speech interfaces.
- Initiated the development of a benchmark scenario for evaluating HRI systems.
Conclusions:
- Systematic analysis of communication failures is vital for improving human-robot interaction.
- An interdisciplinary approach is essential for addressing complex HRI challenges.
- A defined benchmark scenario can guide future research and development in robotic speech interfaces.
Related Concept Videos
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Machines: Problem Solving II
Machines: Problem Solving I
The toggle clamp system is a machine structure consisting of movable, pin-connected multi-force members that form a stabilized system to transmit forces. The...
Barriers to Effective Communication I
Communication barriers include the following:
Physiological barriers: They are limitations caused by a person's health condition or disability, such as hearing loss, poor eyesight, illness, or unconsciousness. An example to overcome this...
Stereotype Content Model
Types of Reports III: Telephone and Verbal Reports
Here's an overview of each type:
Telephone Orders

