Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quality assurance. Evaluate thyself.

L F Maciorowski, E Larson, A Keane

    The Journal of Nursing Administration
    |June 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Developing effective quality assurance (QA) programs requires careful documentation. A new tool was created and validated to assess QA study reports, ensuring reproducible results for program evaluation.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Revolutionizing Pediatric Neurophysiology With Magnetoencephalography.

    Psychophysiology·2026
    Same author

    Surgical Timeliness in Acute Appendicitis: Evaluating Systemic and Demographic Factors Affecting Time to Theatre.

    Irish medical journal·2025
    Same author

    Conservative management of perforation of a duodenal diverticulum.

    Irish medical journal·2025
    Same author

    Mean-field approximation for networks with synchrony-driven adaptive coupling.

    Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2025
    Same author

    Fungal splenic abscess secondary to bariatric tourism in an immunocompetent patient.

    Irish medical journal·2025
    Same author

    Guidelines and practice of breastfeeding in women living with HIV-Results from the European INSURE survey.

    HIV medicine·2023
    Same journal

    The CNO-CFO Dyad: A Strategic Driver of Organizational Performance.

    The Journal of nursing administration·2026
    Same journal

    Elements of Effective Professional Governance: An Integrative Review.

    The Journal of nursing administration·2026
    Same journal

    New Nurse Well-Being: Implications for Retention, Job Satisfaction, and Patient Safety.

    The Journal of nursing administration·2026
    Same journal

    Virtual Nursing Programs in Acute Care Settings: A Scoping Review of Patient, Nurse, and System-Level Outcomes.

    The Journal of nursing administration·2026
    Same journal

    Occupational Fatigue and Cognitive Performance Among Front-Line Nurse Leaders: The Interplay of Personal and Work Factors.

    The Journal of nursing administration·2026
    Same journal

    Enhancing Resilience and Well-Being Among Nurse Leaders: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Mindfulness and Narrative Interventions.

    The Journal of nursing administration·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Healthcare Quality Improvement
    • Clinical Research Methodology

    Background:

    • Systematic and complete documentation is crucial for the sustained value of quality assurance (QA) programs.
    • A review of existing literature indicated a lack of standardized tools for evaluating the effectiveness of QA programs.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To design and test a novel tool for assessing the quality of reports generated from QA studies.
    • To provide an initial step towards establishing the measurable benefits and effectiveness of QA initiatives.

    Main Methods:

    • A literature review was conducted to identify existing gaps in QA program evaluation tools.
    • A new assessment tool was specifically designed to evaluate the reports of QA studies.
    • The developed tool was tested to determine its reliability and reproducibility.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • The literature review confirmed the absence of established tools for evaluating QA program effectiveness.
    • The newly designed tool demonstrated reproducible results during testing.
    • The tool provides a reliable method for assessing the quality of QA study documentation.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed tool is effective for evaluating QA study reports and yields reproducible outcomes.
    • The use of this tool is recommended to enhance the assessment and demonstrate the benefits of QA programs.
    • Further development in evaluating QA program effectiveness is supported by this validated tool.