Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

40.0K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.0K
Group Polarization01:01

Group Polarization

34.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.3K
Interpreting ¹H NMR Signal Splitting: The (n + 1) Rule01:10

Interpreting ¹H NMR Signal Splitting: The (n + 1) Rule

1.3K
In the AX proton spin system, proton A can sense the two spin states of a coupled proton X, resulting in a doublet NMR signal with two peaks of equal (1:1) intensity. When proton A is coupled to two equivalent protons (AX2 spin system), the spin states of each X can be aligned with or against the external field, creating three possible scenarios. This results in a 1:2:1  triplet signal, where the central peak corresponds to the chemical shift of A and is twice as large or intense as the...
1.3K
¹H NMR: Pople Notation01:09

¹H NMR: Pople Notation

1.8K
The Pople nomenclature system classifies spin systems based on the difference between their chemical shifts. Coupled spins are denoted by capital letters with subscripts indicating the number of equivalent nuclei. When the coupled nuclei have well-separated chemical shifts, they are assigned letters that are far apart in the alphabet, such as A and X. When the difference in chemical shifts is small, coupled nuclei are named using adjacent letters of the alphabet (AB, MN, or XY).
A proton...
1.8K
¹H NMR: Complex Splitting01:13

¹H NMR: Complex Splitting

1.3K
A proton M that is coupled to a proton X results in doublet signals for M. However, NMR-active nuclei can be simultaneously coupled to more than one nonequivalent nucleus. When M is coupled to a second proton A, such as in styrene oxide, each peak in the doublet is split into another doublet.
Splitting diagrams or splitting tree diagrams are routinely used to depict such complex couplings. While drawing splitting diagrams, the splitting with the larger coupling constant is usually applied...
1.3K
¹H NMR Signal Multiplicity: Splitting Patterns01:13

¹H NMR Signal Multiplicity: Splitting Patterns

5.2K
When protons A and X are coupled, their nuclear spin energy levels are slightly modified. This is because the energy required to excite proton A to a spin state parallel to proton X is slightly different from the energy required for it to become anti-parallel to spin X. Consequently, there are two possible excitation frequencies for A (A1 and A2), depending on the spin state of X, and vice versa. The mutual nature of coupling implies that the difference between frequencies A1 and A2, indicated...
5.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A sequential model of two-choice intensity identification.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

What is prepared in temporal preparation? A review and a historical appreciation.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

[Doping in recreational sports].

Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz·2026
Same author

Ten years Diffusion Model for Conflict (DMC) tasks: Theoretical foundations, applications, practical recommendations, and open challenges.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

The time-intensity uncertainty principle in vision.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

Internal reference updating in visual duration discrimination: A search for boundary conditions : Internal reference updating.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

How does optical blur affect audiovisual speech perception and emotion perception?

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Is there a cost in forming statistical summary representations at multiple spatial scales?

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Low prevalence targets are primarily missed due to mind wandering.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

An introduction to the special issue celebrating Mary A. Peterson.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Properties of the threshold stimulus exposure duration (TSED) measure of visual search efficiency.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Auditory selective attention in depth: Investigating directional dependency across front, lateral, and rear spaces.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 1, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.5K

Serial processing of proximity groups and similarity groups.

Robert C G Johansson1, Rolf Ulrich2

  • 1Fachbereich Psychologie, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Schleichstraße 4, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. johansson@psycho.uni-tuebingen.de.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|March 12, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Visual perception research reveals proximity grouping is processed faster than similarity grouping. This study confirms a sequential processing order in the visual pathway, with proximity having a temporal advantage.

Keywords:
GestaltPerceptual groupingProximitySerial and parallel processingSimilarity

More Related Videos

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

15.7K
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

447

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 1, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.5K
Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

15.7K
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

447

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Perceptual grouping is fundamental to visual scene understanding.
  • Proximity and feature similarity are key grouping principles.
  • Previous research indicates faster detection of proximity groups over similarity groups.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the sequential processing of perceptual grouping based on proximity and feature similarity.
  • To explore the cognitive architecture underlying perceptual grouping using a double-factorial design.
  • To determine the temporal order and processing dynamics of different grouping cues.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Assessed perceptual judgments of grouping orientation guided by proximity or contrast similarity.
  • Experiment 2: Employed a double-factorial paradigm with redundant signals to analyze latent cognitive architecture.
  • Analyzed reaction time data using race model inequality, workload capacity analysis, and interaction contrasts.

Main Results:

  • Empirical evidence supports a sequential processing model for both proximity and similarity grouping.
  • Proximity grouping demonstrates a temporal processing advantage over similarity grouping.
  • A self-terminating stopping rule was identified for the processing of grouping cues.
  • Individual differences in configural visual processing were suggested by atypical performance metrics.

Conclusions:

  • The visual pathway processes proximity and similarity grouping sequentially, with proximity being faster.
  • The findings provide insights into the cognitive architecture and temporal dynamics of visual grouping.
  • Further research is warranted to explore individual variations in visual processing strategies.