Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Developing a rating interview guide.

E H Battle, S Bragg, J Delaney

The Journal of Nursing Administration

|October 1, 1985

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

ESMO basic requirements for AI-based biomarkers in oncology (EBAI).

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2025

Same author

ESMO guidance on the use of Large Language Models in Clinical Practice (ELCAP).

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2025

Same author

Canadian Surgery Forum: Abstracts of presentations to the Annual Meetings of the Canadian Association of Bariatric Physicians and Surgeons, Canadian Association of General Surgeons, Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons, Canadian Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, Canadian Society of Surgical Oncology, Canadian Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Vancouver, BC, Sept. 17-21, 2013.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2025

Same author

Outcomes of complex burn injury patients managed at two primary and one tertiary level burns facilities in the Western Cape province of South Africa - a retrospective review.

South African journal of surgery. Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir chirurgie·2024

Same author

Cultural adaptation, content, and protocol of a feasibility study of school-based "Let's learn about emotions" intervention for Finnish primary school children.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2024

Same author

Canadian Surgery Forum 2018: St. John's, NL Sept. 13-15, 2018.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2022

Same journal

The CNO-CFO Dyad: A Strategic Driver of Organizational Performance.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026

Same journal

Elements of Effective Professional Governance: An Integrative Review.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026

Same journal

New Nurse Well-Being: Implications for Retention, Job Satisfaction, and Patient Safety.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026

Same journal

Virtual Nursing Programs in Acute Care Settings: A Scoping Review of Patient, Nurse, and System-Level Outcomes.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026

Same journal

Occupational Fatigue and Cognitive Performance Among Front-Line Nurse Leaders: The Interplay of Personal and Work Factors.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026

Same journal

Enhancing Resilience and Well-Being Among Nurse Leaders: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Mindfulness and Narrative Interventions.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026

See all related articles

This study introduces a master interview tool for nursing administrators to evaluate applicant responses effectively. Weighted scoring ensures fair assessment of candidate strengths aligned with job requirements.

Area of Science:

Healthcare Administration
Nursing Management
Human Resources in Healthcare

Background:

Nursing administrators face challenges in developing effective interview tools.
Evaluating applicant responses during interviews is crucial for effective hiring.
Existing interview tools may not adequately assess candidate suitability.

Purpose of the Study:

To present a master interview tool for nursing administrators.
To provide a framework for developing diverse and effective interview instruments.
To enhance the process of evaluating job applicant responses.

Main Methods:

Discussion of a master tool designed as a foundational element for interview instrument development.
Introduction of a weighted scoring system for response evaluation.

Related Experiment Videos

Emphasis on aligning applicant strengths with specific position requirements.

Main Results:

A versatile master tool can serve as a basis for multiple interview instruments.
Weighted scoring provides an equitable method for assessing applicant qualifications.
The tool ensures that applicant evaluations are consistent with institutional needs.

Conclusions:

The proposed master tool and weighted scoring system offer a structured approach to nursing candidate evaluation.
This method supports equitable and effective assessment of applicants' strengths.
Implementation can lead to improved hiring decisions in nursing administration.