Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2025

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
Strategic Approaches for the Health Science Educator: Understanding Strategic Planning, Strategic Thinking, and
Melanie M Lazarus1, Ruth L Bush, Linda Perkowski
1Dr. Lazarus: Professor of Medical Education, Chair of the Office of the Dean, and Dean of the United States Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, OH. Dr. Bush: Professor of Surgery and the Associate Dean of Educational Affairs at the John Sealy School of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX. Dr. Perkowski: Emeritus Professor at Central Michigan University College of Medicine, Mt. Pleasant, MI. Dr. McNeil: Associate Professor of Curriculum and Instruction and the Learning, Design and Technology specialization Lead at the College of Education, University of Houston, Houston, TX.
Health science institutions face budget constraints and seek efficient organizational improvement. This study clarifies strategic planning, strategic thinking, and continuous process improvement (CPI) to enhance academic healthcare leadership.
Area of Science:
- Health Care Management
- Organizational Development
- Educational Administration
Background:
- Academic health science institutions face increasing demands for student services with limited resources.
- Leaders seek effective strategies to modernize operations and improve efficiency.
- Common improvement approaches like strategic planning, strategic thinking, and continuous process improvement (CPI) are often misunderstood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To clarify the distinct concepts of strategic planning, strategic thinking, and CPI for academic health care leaders.
- To provide concise definitions and explore the benefits and pitfalls of each approach.
- To introduce novice strategists to foundational tools for each improvement method.
Main Methods:
- Review and synthesis of existing literature on strategic planning, strategic thinking, and CPI.
- Development of concise, distinct definitions for each concept.
- Identification and explanation of one introductory tool for each approach: SWOT for strategic planning, GOST for strategic thinking, and Pareto Chart for CPI.
Main Results:
- Distinction between strategic planning, strategic thinking, and CPI is clarified.
- Concise definitions and practical applications are provided for each approach.
- Accessible tools (SWOT, GOST, Pareto Chart) are recommended for implementation.
Conclusions:
- Clear understanding of strategic planning, strategic thinking, and CPI is crucial for effective organizational improvement in health science institutions.
- The provided definitions and tools can guide leaders in selecting and implementing appropriate improvement strategies.
- Adoption of these structured approaches can help institutions meet evolving demands despite resource limitations.
Related Concept Videos
Critical Thinking II
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching II: Planning and Implementation
Critical Thinking I
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques VI
Motivation and Self-Determination
Motivation, the driving force behind behavior, plays a pivotal role at every stage of the change process. The research...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Patient-centered Care

