Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 30, 2025

The Microscopic Transcanal Approach in Stapes Surgery Revisited
07:35

The Microscopic Transcanal Approach in Stapes Surgery Revisited

Published on: February 16, 2022

2.3K

Transcanal Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Tympanoplasty: Is There a Difference in Perforation Closure Rates?

Tanner Mitton1, Jenny Kim1, Daniel E Killeen2

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.

Otology & Neurotology Open
|March 22, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A multifaceted antimicrobial stewardship intervention to improve antibiotic utilization and prescribing for sinusitis in a large primary care network.

Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE·2026
Same author

Development of a Core Outcome Domain Set for Facial Aging.

JAMA dermatology·2026
Same author

Robotic-Assisted Electrode Insertion for Pediatric Cochlear Implantation: A Multicenter Study.

The Laryngoscope·2026
Same author

Unique Natural History of Very Small Vestibular Schwannoma Substantiates Size Threshold Surveillance.

The Laryngoscope·2026
Same author

The impact of racial diversity within college campuses for students of color.

Cultural diversity & ethnic minority psychology·2026
Same author

Frequent S100 and PAX8 expression in otitis media: Unexpected findings and potential sources of diagnostic confusion in middle ear pathology.

Annals of diagnostic pathology·2026
Same journal

Isotretinoin-induced Intracranial Hypertension Presenting as Unilateral Pulsatile Tinnitus.

Otology & neurotology open·2026
Same journal

Estrogen Exposure is Associated With Reduced Otosclerosis Risk in Obesity and Hormone Therapy.

Otology & neurotology open·2026
Same journal

Vestibular Profile of Patients with Hearing Loss Caused by Pathogenic Variants of the <i>STRC</i> Gene.

Otology & neurotology open·2026
Same journal

Audiovisual Speech Recognition in Adult Cochlear Implant Candidates: Relations with Cognitive-Linguistic Abilities.

Otology & neurotology open·2026
Same journal

Improved Speech Recognition with Automated ForwardFocus in Cochlear Kanso 3 Sound Processor Users.

Otology & neurotology open·2026
Same journal

Tympanic Bone: Small Neglected Bone with Extreme Anatomic Importance in Lateral Skull-Base Surgery.

Otology & neurotology open·2026
See all related articles

Endoscopic tympanoplasty (ET) offers similar tympanic membrane closure rates to microscopic tympanoplasty (MT). This study found no significant differences in closure based on perforation size, location, or graft position for either technique.

Area of Science:

  • Otolaryngology
  • Surgical Innovation
  • Medical Technology

Background:

  • Tympanoplasty is a surgical procedure to repair a perforated tympanic membrane.
  • Microscopic tympanoplasty (MT) is the traditional approach, while transcanal endoscopic tympanoplasty (ET) is a newer technique.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the postoperative closure rates of transcanal endoscopic tympanoplasty (ET) versus microscopic tympanoplasty (MT).
  • To evaluate the influence of perforation size, location, and graft position on closure rates for both techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective chart review of adult patients undergoing tympanoplasty between 2010 and 2019.
  • Comparison of tympanic membrane closure rates between ET and MT groups, with at least 2 months of follow-up.
Keywords:
Transcanal endoscopic ear surgeryTympanoplasty

More Related Videos

Endaural Endoscopic Atticoantrotomy Retrograde Mastoidectomy using a Constant Suction Bone-drilling Technique
07:06

Endaural Endoscopic Atticoantrotomy Retrograde Mastoidectomy using a Constant Suction Bone-drilling Technique

Published on: May 23, 2021

3.8K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Endoscopic Ossiculoplasty &#8211; Techniques, Innovations, and Practical Guidance for Clinical Integration
09:07

Author Spotlight: Advancing Endoscopic Ossiculoplasty – Techniques, Innovations, and Practical Guidance for Clinical Integration

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 30, 2025

The Microscopic Transcanal Approach in Stapes Surgery Revisited
07:35

The Microscopic Transcanal Approach in Stapes Surgery Revisited

Published on: February 16, 2022

2.3K
Endaural Endoscopic Atticoantrotomy Retrograde Mastoidectomy using a Constant Suction Bone-drilling Technique
07:06

Endaural Endoscopic Atticoantrotomy Retrograde Mastoidectomy using a Constant Suction Bone-drilling Technique

Published on: May 23, 2021

3.8K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Endoscopic Ossiculoplasty &#8211; Techniques, Innovations, and Practical Guidance for Clinical Integration
09:07

Author Spotlight: Advancing Endoscopic Ossiculoplasty – Techniques, Innovations, and Practical Guidance for Clinical Integration

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.3K

Main Results:

  • A total of 211 patients were analyzed (98 ET, 113 MT).
  • No significant difference in closure rates was observed between ET (79.6%) and MT (84.1%) (P = 0.473).
  • Multivariable analysis confirmed no significant difference in closure rates based on perforation characteristics or graft position.

Conclusions:

  • Transcanal endoscopic tympanoplasty (ET) achieves comparable postoperative closure rates to microscopic tympanoplasty (MT).
  • The choice between ET and MT does not appear to significantly impact closure success, regardless of perforation specifics.