Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2025
06:48
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
9.3K
The dynamics of competition and decision-making
Andrew J Morgan1, Andrew Neal2, Timothy Ballard2
1School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. andrew.morgan@uqconnect.edu.au.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|June 10, 2024
Summary
Cognitive modeling reveals that as competition deadlines near and participants gain an advantage, they increase effort and caution. These dynamics shift as the competition progresses, influencing strategic decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Behavioral Economics
- Decision Science
Background:
- Understanding the cognitive processes driving competitive behavior is crucial.
- Dynamic factors like time pressure and relative performance significantly influence decision-making.
- Previous research often overlooks the temporal dynamics of competitive strategy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the cognitive mechanisms underlying changes in effort and strategy during competitions.
- To examine the dynamic effects of time remaining and relative performance on participant behavior.
- To model how these factors interact to shape competitive outcomes over time.
Main Methods:
- Employed cognitive modeling techniques to analyze participant behavior.
- Designed a competitive decision-making task with controlled time limits and starting scores.
- Utilized a repeated-measures design to assess individual responses to varying conditions.
Main Results:
- Participants increased effort and caution as competition deadlines approached.
- Gaining an advantage (outperforming the opponent) also led to increased effort and caution.
- The influence of relative performance on effort and caution evolved dynamically as the deadline neared.
Conclusions:
- Competition dynamics, including time and relative standing, are critical for understanding behavior.
- Cognitive mechanisms driving effort and strategy are sensitive to temporal and performance feedback.
- Future research should incorporate dynamic modeling to capture the complexities of competitive interactions.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
02:34Competition
21.5K
When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.
21.5K
01:20Decision Making
106
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
106
01:14Decision Making: Traditional Method
4.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.0K
01:09Decision Making: P-value Method
5.3K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.3K
01:37Reason and Intuition
6.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.4K
01:20Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance
60
Frustration occurs when people are obstructed or prevented from achieving a desired goal or fulfilling a perceived need. For example, when someone's input is ignored in a discussion, it can lead to feelings of frustration. Conflict, however, arises from opposing interests, goals, or actions. Conflicts can take various forms based on the nature of these opposing desires or goals.
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
60