Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II01:19

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

357
In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...
357

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Tracking U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Supply Chain Greenhouse Gas Emission Intensity through Direct Measurements.

Environmental science & technology·2026
Same author

Cause-informed framework for risk-targeted methane emission mitigation in oil and gas operations.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Methane by the Numbers: The Need for Clear and Comparable Methane Intensity Metrics.

Environmental science & technology·2026
Same author

Advanced Leak Detection Methods for Belowground Natural Gas Pipeline Leaks: Evaluation under Diverse Environmental and Operational Conditions.

ACS omega·2026
Same author

Performance Evaluation of Survey Solutions in Detecting and Localizing Source-Level Emissions Using a Single-Blind Controlled Testing Protocol.

Environmental science & technology·2025
Same author

Intercomparison of Three Continuous Monitoring Systems on Operating Oil and Gas Sites.

ACS ES&T air·2025
Same journal

RETRACTED: Zhang et al. A Novel Framework for Reconstruction and Imaging of Target Scattering Centers via Wide-Angle Incidence in Radar Networks. <i>Sensors</i> 2025, <i>25</i>, 6802.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Unsupervised Multi-Source Domain Adaptation for Person Re-Identification via Mixture of Experts and Graph-Based Relation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development of an Instrumented Glove for Palmar Pressure Assessment in Kayakers.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development and Experimental Validation of an Autonomous IoT-Based Monitoring System for Real-Time Water Quality Assessment in the Amazon River.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Semi-Supervised Adversarial Learning Framework for Controller Area Network Bus Intrusion Detection.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Smart Optimization Method for Safety Signs in Innovative Manufacturing Environments Integrating Industrial Field IoT Sensors and Knowledge Graphs.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2025

Design and Use of a Full Flow Sampling System FFS for the Quantification of Methane Emissions
08:18

Design and Use of a Full Flow Sampling System FFS for the Quantification of Methane Emissions

Published on: June 12, 2016

16.7K

Methane Quantification Performance of the Quantitative Optical Gas Imaging (QOGI) System Using Single-Blind

Chiemezie Ilonze1, Jiayang Lyra Wang2,3, Arvind P Ravikumar2,3

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|July 13, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study evaluated the FLIR QL320 quantitative optical gas imaging (QOGI) system for natural gas leak detection. The system showed variable accuracy, with most measurements within a factor of 3, improving under optimal conditions.

Keywords:
FLIRFLIR QL320Providence Photonics QL320QOGIemissions quantificationmethanemethane quantification

More Related Videos

Measuring Dissolved Methane in Aquatic Ecosystems Using An Optical Spectroscopy Gas Analyzer
05:00

Measuring Dissolved Methane in Aquatic Ecosystems Using An Optical Spectroscopy Gas Analyzer

Published on: July 26, 2024

422
The Use of an Automated System GreenFeed to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals
11:02

The Use of an Automated System GreenFeed to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals

Published on: September 7, 2015

21.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2025

Design and Use of a Full Flow Sampling System FFS for the Quantification of Methane Emissions
08:18

Design and Use of a Full Flow Sampling System FFS for the Quantification of Methane Emissions

Published on: June 12, 2016

16.7K
Measuring Dissolved Methane in Aquatic Ecosystems Using An Optical Spectroscopy Gas Analyzer
05:00

Measuring Dissolved Methane in Aquatic Ecosystems Using An Optical Spectroscopy Gas Analyzer

Published on: July 26, 2024

422
The Use of an Automated System GreenFeed to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals
11:02

The Use of an Automated System GreenFeed to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals

Published on: September 7, 2015

21.9K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Chemical Engineering
  • Instrumentation & Measurement

Background:

  • Optical gas imaging (OGI) is crucial for detecting methane (CH4) leaks in the oil and gas industry.
  • Quantitative OGI (QOGI) systems offer potential for rapid, accurate leak quantification.
  • Standardized evaluation of QOGI performance is necessary for widespread adoption.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the quantification accuracy of the FLIR QL320 QOGI system.
  • To evaluate system performance under realistic, near-field conditions mimicking oil and gas operations.
  • To identify factors influencing QOGI measurement accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Single-blind experiments were conducted at an outdoor, controlled testing facility.
  • 357 measurements were taken for controlled releases of compressed natural gas (0.1–2.9 kg CH4/h).
  • Data were analyzed across 26 release scenarios and 71 camera positions.

Main Results:

  • 75% of individual measurements fell within a quantification factor of 3 (error: -67% to 200%).
  • Individual measurement errors ranged from -90% to 831%.
  • Averaging estimates from multiple camera positions reduced errors to -79% to +297%.

Conclusions:

  • QOGI system performance is dependent on environmental and operational factors.
  • Accuracy improved with higher release rates, clear skies, and low wind speeds (≤1 mph).
  • The FLIR QL320 shows promise but requires careful consideration of conditions for reliable methane leak quantification.