The History of Macrophage Activation Syndrome in Autoimmune Diseases

In 1979, it became recognized in the literature that what we call hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) was a nonmalignant disease of histiocytes. Subsequently a familial form and a secondary form of HLH were differentiated. When HLH is secondary to an autoimmune disease, rheumatologists refer to this entity as macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) to differentiate it from HLH itself. Although the first cases of MAS likely appeared in the literature in the 1970s, it was not until 1985 that the term activated macrophages was used to describe patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) complicated by MAS and the term macrophage activation syndrome first appeared in the title of a paper in 1993.MAS is one of the many types of secondary HLH and should not be confused with primary HLH. Experience has taught that MAS secondary to different autoimmune diseases is not equal. In the 30 years since initial description in patients with sJIA, the clinical spectrum, diseases associated with MAS, therapy, and understanding the pathogenesis have all made significant gains. The diagnostic/classification criteria for MAS secondary to sJIA, SLE, RA, and KD differ based on the different laboratory abnormalities associated with each (Ahn et al., J Rheumatol 44:996-1003, 2017; Han et al., Ann Rheum Dis 75:e44, 2016; Ravelli et al., Ann Rheum Dis 75:481-489, 2016; Borgia et al., Arthritis Rheumatol 70:616-624, 2018). These examples include the thrombocytosis associated with sJIA, a chronic generalized activation of the immune system, leading to elevations of fibrinogen and sIL-2R, low platelet count associated with SLE, and more acute inflammation associated with KD. Therefore, individual diagnostic criteria are required, and they all differ from the diagnostic criteria for HLH, which are based on a previously non-activated immune system (Ahn et al., J Rheumatol 44:996-1003, 2017; Han et al., Ann Rheum Dis 75:e44, 2016; Ravelli et al., Ann Rheum Dis 75:481-489, 2016; Borgia et al., Arthritis Rheumatol 70:616-624, 2018; Henter et al., Pediatr Blood Cancer 48:124-131, 2007). This helps to explain why the HLH diagnostic criteria do not perform well in MAS.The initial treatment remains high-dose steroids and IVIG followed by the use of a calcineurin inhibitor for resistant cases. IVIG can be used if there is a concern about malignancy to wait for appropriate investigations or with steroids. Interluekin-1 inhibition is now the next therapy if there is a failure to respond to steroids and calcineurin inhibitors. Advances in understanding the mechanisms leading to MAS, which has been greatly aided by the use of mouse models of MAS and advances in genome sequencing, offer a bright future for more specific therapies. More recent therapies are directed to specific cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of MAS and can lead to decreases in the morbidity and mortality associated with MAS. These include therapies directed to inhibiting the JAK/STAT pathway and/or specific cytokines, interleukin-18 and gamma interferon, which are currently being studied in MAS. These more specific therapies may obviate the need for nonspecific immunosuppressive therapies including high-dose prolonged steroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and etoposide.