Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2025

How to Administer Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Critically ill Neonates, Infants, and Children
Published on: August 19, 2020
Characterization of Awareness and Depth of Blockade During Neuromuscular Blockade Infusions in Critically Ill
Kelly M Bodine1, Elizabeth J Beckman2
1Department of Pharmacy (KMB), Grady Health System, Atlanta, GA.
Insights
Pediatric intensive care units often lack consistent monitoring for sedation and neuromuscular blockade depth. Sedation practices, particularly with dexmedetomidine, may not align with guidelines during neuromuscular blocking agent infusions.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
- Neuroscience
- Pharmacology
Background:
- The Society of Critical Care Medicine established guidelines for managing pain, agitation, neuromuscular blockade, and delirium in critically ill pediatric patients.
- However, recommendations for sedation practices and monitoring during neuromuscular blockade were conditional.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize sedation practices in critically ill pediatric patients receiving continuous infusions of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs).
- To assess patient awareness and depth of blockade during NMBA infusion.
- To evaluate adherence to current guidelines in a pediatric cardiac intensive care unit.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective chart review was conducted on critically ill pediatric patients who received continuous infusion NMBAs.
- Data collected included analgosedation agents, doses, and changes, alongside depth of blockade monitoring using Train of Four (TOF) and patient awareness assessed by Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS).
Main Results:
- Thirty-one patients were included; 87% had concurrent sedation and 54% received analgesia.
- Rocuronium, dexmedetomidine, and morphine were common agents.
- While RASS scores were recorded for all, 29% had positive scores, indicating inadequate sedation.
- TOF monitoring was documented in only 35% of patients, with most scores indicating either no blockade or deep blockade.
Conclusions:
- Most patients did not receive the recommended depth of blockade monitoring via TOF.
- RASS scores were inconsistent with deep sedation in half of the patients.
- The frequent use of dexmedetomidine as a sole sedative agent raises concerns about current sedation strategies during NMBA infusions.
Objective:
The Society of Critical Care Medicine released the first guideline for the prevention and -management of pain, agitation, neuromuscular blockade, and delirium in critically ill pediatric patients but offered conditional recommendations for sedation practices and monitoring during neuromuscular blockade. This study aimed to characterize sedation practices, patient awareness, and depth of blockade with neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA) infusion administration in a single pediatric and cardiac intensive care unit.
Methods:
This retrospective chart review of critically ill pediatric patients queried orders for continuous infusion NMBA. Analgosedation agent(s), dose, and dose changes were assessed, along with depth of blockade monitoring via Train of Four (TOF) and awareness via Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS).
Results:
Thirty-one patients were included, of which 27 (87%) had a documented sedation agent infusing at time of NMBA initiation and 17 patients (54%) were receiving analgesia. The most common agents used were rocuronium (n = 28), dexmedetomidine (n = 23), and morphine (n = 14). RASS scores were captured in all patients; however, 9 patients (29%) had recorded positive scores and 1 patient (3%) never achieved negative scores. TOF was only captured for 11 patients (35%), with majority of the scores being 0 or 4.
Conclusions:
Majority of the study population did not receive recommended depth of blockade monitoring via TOF. Similarly, RASS scores were not consistent with deep sedation in half of the patients. The common use of dexmedetomidine as a single sedation agent calls into question the appropriateness of current sedation practices during NMBA continuous infusions.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacological Actions
Although all competitive neuromuscular blockers are designed...
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacokinetics
Instead, they are transported by the blood to different tissues. Muscles with a greater blood supply (arteries) and blood flow receive more...
Depolarizing Blockers: Mechanism of Action
Succinylcholine is the most commonly used depolarizing blocker. Chemically, it constitutes two molecules of acetylcholine joined together by an acetate methyl group. They act on the receptors in the same way as acetylcholine. Because...
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Mechanism of Action
Competitive antagonists prevent acetylcholine from binding to its receptor, inhibiting membrane depolarization. Without conformational changes or intrinsic...
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses

