Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Crack Monitoring in Resonance Fatigue Testing of Welded Specimens Using Digital Image Correlation
Published on: September 29, 2019
Numerical Fatigue Crack Growth on Compact Tension Specimens under Mode I and Mixed-Mode (I+II) Loading.
Rui F Martins1,2, José Xavier1,2, João Caldeira1
1UNIDEMI, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Campus de Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.
This study validates numerical stress intensity factor calculations for Compact Tension (CT) specimens under various loading modes. The Extended Finite Element Method (XFEM) effectively simulates fatigue crack growth in AISI 316L steel.
Area of Science:
- Mechanical Engineering
- Materials Science
- Computational Mechanics
Background:
- Compact Tension (CT) specimens are crucial for fracture mechanics testing.
- Accurate stress intensity factor (K) calculations are vital for predicting material failure.
- Understanding mixed-mode loading effects (Modes I and II) is essential for real-world applications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To numerically analyze stress intensity factors (K) in CT specimens under pure mode I and mixed-mode (I+II) loading.
- To validate numerical results against analytical solutions for pure mode I loading.
- To investigate fatigue crack growth using the Extended Finite Element Method (XFEM) under mode I loading.
Main Methods:
- Numerical analysis using Abaqus® 2022 for stress intensity factor (K) calculations.
- Comparison of numerical K values with analytical solutions for pure mode I loading.
- Fatigue crack growth simulation employing the Extended Finite Element Method (XFEM) and Paris Law for AISI 316L stainless steel.
Main Results:
- Excellent agreement was observed between numerical and analytical stress intensity factors (KI) under pure mode I loading.
- Numerical stress intensity factors (KI, KII, KIII) were successfully obtained for mixed-mode loading.
- The Extended Finite Element Method (XFEM) demonstrated effectiveness in predicting crack propagation direction and growth.
Conclusions:
- Numerical methods, particularly Abaqus®, provide accurate stress intensity factor calculations for CT specimens.
- XFEM is a reliable tool for simulating fatigue crack growth, contingent upon appropriate mesh refinement.
- The study confirms the applicability of these methods for analyzing crack behavior in materials like AISI 316L stainless steel.
Related Concept Videos
Fatigue
Relation between Poisson's ratio, Modulus of Elasticity and Modulus of Rigidity
Fatigue Strength of Concrete
Stress: General Loading Conditions
The shearing force, possessing potential directionality within the plane of the section, is simplified into two component forces running parallel to the x and y axes....
Yield Criteria for Ductile Materials under Plane Stress
The Maximum Shearing Stress Criterion, also known as...
Stress-Strain Diagram - Ductile Materials

