Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

12:02
Automated Modular High Throughput Exopolysaccharide Screening Platform Coupled with Highly Sensitive Carbohydrate Fingerprint Analysis
Published on: April 11, 2016
11.5K
Benchmarking Point-of-Care Glucometers: A Comparative Study Using the Hexokinase Test and International Organization
Kelita George1, Sarah Joy2, Haseena Kaladi Palliyalil1
1Community Medicine, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi, IND.
Cureus
|November 7, 2024
Summary
This study assessed the accuracy of three point-of-care glucometers against the ISO15197:2013 standard. Only one glucometer, using the glucose dehydrogenase with flavin adenine dinucleotide (GDH-FAD) method, met the required accuracy criteria for patient safety.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Medical Device Accuracy
- Diabetes Management
Background:
- Diabetes self-monitoring of blood glucose is crucial for effective management.
- India has a high prevalence of diabetes, with one in seven adults affected.
- Accuracy of widely used point-of-care glucometers remains a concern.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of three point-of-care glucometers against the ISO15197:2013 standard.
- To compare glucometer performance using glucose dehydrogenase with pyrroloquinoline quinone (GDH-PQQ), glucose dehydrogenase with flavin adenine dinucleotide (GDH-FAD), and glucose oxidase (GOD) methods.
- To assess clinical acceptability of glucometer readings using Clarke error grid analysis.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional study at two primary health care centers.
- Inclusion of 73 participants with diabetes and 73 without diabetes.
- Comparison of glucometer readings with the gold standard hexokinase test.
- Statistical analysis using Bland-Altman plots and Clarke error grid analysis.
Main Results:
- Only 78.08% (GOD), 92.4% (GDH-PQQ), and 95.8% (GDH-FAD) of results met ISO15197:2013 accuracy criteria.
- All tested glucometers demonstrated clinically acceptable results within zones A and B of the consensus error grid.
- The GDH-FAD method exhibited the narrowest agreement range and minimal bias (-0.89) in Bland-Altman analysis.
Conclusions:
- Only the GDH-FAD method-based glucometer satisfied the ISO15197:2013 accuracy requirements.
- Ensuring glucometer accuracy is paramount for patient safety in diabetes care.
- Further validation of point-of-care testing devices is recommended.

