Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2025

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
The Association of Electrical Risk Score with Prognosis in Patients with Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Ali Nizami Elmas1, Halil Fedai2, Kenan Toprak2
1Clinic of Cardiology, Menderes State Hospital, İzmir, Türkiye.
Background:
Acute coronary syndromes are the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Electrical risk score (ERS) is a novel electrocardiographic risk scoring system. The prognostic importance of ERS in non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients is unknown. We aimed to determine the association of ERS with in-hospital prognosis in NSTEMI patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG).
Methods:
A total of 427 consecutive NSTEMI patients undergoing CAG were enrolled in this study. Six parameters comprised ERS: pulse rate >75, left ventricular hypertrophy according to Sokolow-Lyon criteria, QRS transition zone ≥V4, corrected QT (QTc) interval >450 for men and >460 for women, T peak to T end interval (Tp-e) >89 ms, and frontal QRS-T angle >90°. The ERS was calculated according to the number of abnormal findings in electrocardiogram. The study population was divided into 2 groups as ERS <3 and ≥3.
Results:
No significant difference was found between ERS ≥3 and <3 groups in terms of demographic characteristics. However, patients with ERS ≥3 had significantly higher maximum troponin (P < .001), thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (P = .002), and global registry of acute coronary events (P < .001) risk scores and 3-vessel disease frequency (P = .001), whereas they had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (P < .001). These patients also had higher frequency of in-hospital mortality (P < .001) and adverse events. Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that ERS (OR = 1.790, 95% CI: 1.036-3.095, P = .037) was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality.
Conclusion:
The frequency of in-hospital adverse events and mortality was significantly higher in NSTEMI patients with an ERS ≥3 at admission. This simple electrocardiographic risk marker may help identify patients at higher cardiac risk in patients presenting with NSTEMI and identify patients who may need early coronary intervention.
More Related Videos
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
10:03Coronary Progenitor Cells and Soluble Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Prognosis after Coronary Angioplasty
Published on: January 28, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Electrocardiogram
Three major waveforms are present in a typical ECG recording: the P wave, the QRS complex, and...