Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2025

Removal of Arsenic Using a Cationic Polymer Gel Impregnated with Iron Hydroxide
Published on: June 28, 2019
The Adsorption of Arsenate and Arsenite Ions on Oxidic Substrates Prepared with a Variable-Charge Lithological
Xinyao Ren1, Enju Wang1, Fernando Millán1,2
1Department of Chemistry, Saint John's University, Jamaica, NY 11439, USA.
Abstract:
The adsorption of As(V) and As(III) (0.01-1 mM) on a calcined oxidic lithologic material substrate with pH-dependent surface variable charges, chemically modifiable, was investigated. The substrate was prepared via thermal treatment using a natural lithologic material rich in amphoteric oxides of Fe, Al, Mn and Ti. The calcined substrate was treated with acid media (HCl 0.1) to homogenize the positive charge density on the oxide surface via oxide protonation so that anion adsorption would be favored. A batch experiment was performed on the acid-treated substrate (activated) and non-activated substrate. L-type isotherms were obtained, which fit the Freundlich model. Isotherm constants showed that there was a greater affinity between the activated substrate and As(V) (K = 10.58) compared to As(III) (K = 5.45). The adsorption capacity of the activated substrate was two times greater than that of the non-activated substrate, As(V) (K = 10.58 and K = 5.45) vs. As(III) (K = 5.45 y K = 2.44), which was due to the greater positive charge density on the activated surface, created by the protonation of the surface oxides. Protons were liberated during the adsorption reaction (As(V): 2.17 × 10-3 and As(III): 0.96 × 10-3 mmol/mL). The forms H2AsO4- and H3AsO3 deprotonated when adsorbed by the surface groups M-OH2+ (M: Fe, Al). Kinetic data showed a second-order process for As(V) adsorption and a first-order process for As(III) adsorption. The adsorption rate on the activated substrate was two times greater compared with the non-activated substrate: As(V) (k = 3.78 × 10-5 L/mg·min and k = 2.16 × 10-5 L/mg·min) vs. As(III) (k = 0.055 h-1 and k = 0.027 h-1). The tested substrate is potentially useful as a low-cost natural material for arsenic removal from contaminated water.
More Related Videos
09:23Removal of Trace Elements by Cupric Oxide Nanoparticles from Uranium In Situ Recovery Bleed Water and Its Effect on Cell Viability
Published on: June 21, 2015
06:52Experimental Column Setup for Studying Anaerobic Biogeochemical Interactions Between Iron OxyHydroxides, Trace Elements, and Bacteria
Published on: December 19, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Gravimetry: Inorganic And Organic Precipitating Agents
Extraction: Advanced Methods
Precipitation and Co-precipitation
Voltammetry: Stripping Methods
Anodic Stripping Voltammetry (ASV)
ASV is used to determine metals and metalloids at trace levels. It involves two steps: deposition and stripping. First, a negative potential is applied to the...
Electrodeposition
Electrodeposition can...
Precipitation of Ions
The equation that describes the equilibrium between solid calcium carbonate and its solvated ions is: