Implementation of a Child Maltreatment Screening Tool in the Prehospital Setting

Makenzie Ferguson1, Shelley Brukman1, Kim Zaky1,2

  • 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of Orange County (CHOC Children's), Orange, California.

Prehospital Emergency Care
|December 17, 2024
PubMed

Insights

Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians can now use the Shield tool to screen for child maltreatment in the prehospital setting. This new screening aid was well-integrated and accepted by EMS clinicians, showing potential for standardized child abuse detection.

Area of Science:

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Pediatrics
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians are uniquely positioned to identify child maltreatment due to their frequent encounters with children in home environments.
  • Existing child maltreatment screening tools are primarily designed for primary care and emergency departments, with a gap in prehospital settings.
  • EMS training on recognizing child maltreatment signs is often insufficient, highlighting the need for specialized tools.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop, implement, and evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of a prehospital child maltreatment screening tool.
  • To adapt an existing screening tool (P-CAST) for use in the prehospital environment.
  • To assess the integration and usability of the screening tool within the EMS electronic patient care report (ePCR) system.

Main Methods:

  • A mixed-methods study combining qualitative and quantitative data collection from June 2021 to June 2022.
  • Development of the "Shield" screening tool by adapting the Pittsburgh Child Abuse Screening Tool (P-CAST).
  • Integration of Shield into the ePCR system for three participating fire agencies, with subsequent data collection and clinician feedback via surveys and focus groups.

Main Results:

  • Shield screenings were initiated on 948 out of 1,054 eligible pediatric patients (<15 years old) and completed on 753.
  • 3.4% (32 patients) screened positive for findings concerning for maltreatment.
  • Post-implementation focus groups indicated that EMS clinicians found Shield to be well-integrated into their ePCR workflow.

Conclusions:

  • The Shield screening tool was initiated in nearly 90% of evaluated pediatric patients, demonstrating high potential for adoption.
  • The tool shows promise in standardizing child maltreatment screening within the prehospital setting.
  • The positive feedback from EMS clinicians suggests good acceptability and feasibility for routine use.
Abstract