Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025
06:18
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
2.0K
Mutual inclusivity improves decision-making by smoothing out choice's competitive edge.
Xiamin Leng1,2, Romy Frömer3,4, Thomas Summe3
1Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Carney Institute for Brain Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA. xiamin_leng@berkeley.edu.
Nature Human Behaviour
|December 20, 2024
Summary
Making choices inclusive, allowing multiple selections, reduces decision costs and improves efficiency. This approach enhances decision-making experiences by reducing conflict, unlike simply increasing urgency.
Area of Science:
- Decision Science
- Cognitive Psychology
- Behavioral Economics
Background:
- Decision-making is often a bottleneck, perceived as costly.
- Existing research suggests lowering decision thresholds to mitigate costs.
- The cost of choice is often linked to the principle of mutual exclusivity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate inclusivity as an alternative strategy to reduce choice costs.
- To examine if framing choices as inclusive alleviates decision tension.
- To differentiate inclusivity benefits from decision threshold manipulation.
Main Methods:
- Conducted 6 studies with 565 participants.
- Framed choices using an inclusive (multi-select) vs. exclusive (single-select) paradigm.
- Measured decision efficiency and participant experience.
Main Results:
- Inclusivity enhanced choice efficiency by reducing response competition during information gathering.
- Participants reported less conflict when choices were framed inclusively.
- Benefits of inclusivity were distinct from effects of increased decision urgency.
Conclusions:
- Framing choices as inclusive offers a novel method to improve decision efficiency and experience.
- Inclusivity effectively reduces the perceived cost of choice by mitigating mutual exclusivity.
- This strategy provides benefits beyond simply increasing decision speed.
Related Concept Videos
01:20Decision Making
86
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
86
01:31In- and Out-Groups
38.8K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
38.8K
00:57Inclusive Fitness
35.9K
Most altruistic behavior—in which one animal helps another at a cost to themselves—occurs between relatives. Scientists think these altruistic behaviors evolved because they increase the inclusive fitness of the animal providing help.
35.9K
01:09Decision Making: P-value Method
5.3K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.3K
01:14Decision Making: Traditional Method
4.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.0K
01:34Groupthink
44.1K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.1K