Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2025

07:26
Systematic Assessment of Mammalian Skull Specimens for Dental and Temporomandibular Joint Pathology
Published on: August 22, 2022
1.3K
Forensic pathology standards in China: a 30-year retrospective study.
Tu Lyu1,2, Dong Zhao3, Guanglong He2
1Key Laboratory of Evidence Science (China University of Political Science and Law), Ministry of Education, Beijing, 100088, China.
International Journal of Legal Medicine
|January 24, 2025
Summary
China
Area of Science:
- Forensic Science
- Standardization
- Legal Medicine
Background:
- Forensic pathology standardization in China spans over 30 years.
- Limited research exists on the characteristics and details of these standards.
- A comprehensive analysis is needed to understand the current state of forensic pathology standards in China.
Purpose of the Study:
- To statistically analyze the types, scope, and development of China's forensic pathology standards.
- To identify the strengths and weaknesses of the current standardization system.
- To provide recommendations for future improvements in forensic pathology standardization.
Main Methods:
- Collection of documents on forensic pathology standards from official websites and databases.
- Statistical analysis of standard types, validity, drafting units, and revision cycles.
- Evaluation of the established standards system and identification of challenges.
Main Results:
- Thirty-six forensic pathology standards have been published since 1991 (1 national, 31 sector, 4 enterprise).
- Twenty-four standards are currently valid; twelve have been repealed.
- The system includes 2 management and 34 technical standards, with revision cycles ranging from 9 to 23 years.
Conclusions:
- China's forensic pathology standardization system is largely established, emphasizing public welfare.
- Challenges include deficiencies in basic/management standards, meeting national standard requirements, and delayed revisions.
- Future efforts should focus on promoting national standards, adopting international practices, strengthening foundational standards, and encouraging flexible, efficient, and innovative standards development.

