Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Published on: July 5, 2011
Association Between Tourniquet Use and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Multicenter
Brian Gibbs1, Jhase Sniderman1,2, Shariq Mohammed3,4
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Background:
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most commonly performed elective procedures in North America. While advancements have been made in patient optimization, surgical technique, and implant design, tourniquet use remains a contentious issue as it relates to patient outcomes and postoperative experience.
Methods:
As part of the PEPPER trial, we identified 5,684 patients who underwent primary TKA, of whom 4,866 (85.6%) underwent surgery with a tourniquet (the YT group) and 818 (14.4%) underwent surgery without a tourniquet (the NT group). The cohort was predominantly female (60.8%), White (77%), and of an ethnicity other than Hispanic or Latino (96.8%). The mean age of the patients was 64.6 ± 9.2 years. The primary outcomes were the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement (KOOS JR); Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Health Summary (PROMIS-PH10); and numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), which were captured preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were length of stay, discharge disposition, analgesic consumption, and postoperative complications. Multivariable analysis was performed to assess the associations between tourniquet use and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following TKA.
Results:
The percentages of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the KOOS JR were significantly different at 1 month only (YT, 55.4%; NT, 47.9%). This difference disappeared at 3 and 6 months. There was no difference between the YT and NT groups in terms of the percentage of patients achieving the MCID for the PROMIS-PH10 or NPRS at any time point. There were no differences between the YT and NT groups at any time point with respect to the KOOS JR, PROMIS-PH10, and NPRS. There were no differences in opioid consumption, operative time, length of stay, wound-related complications, or readmissions postoperatively.
Conclusions:
Tourniquet use was associated with more patients achieving the MCID for the KOOS JR at 1 month compared with no tourniquet use. This difference disappeared at 3 and 6 months. At 1, 3, and 6 months, there were no differences in opioid consumption, health-care utilization, or complications between patients undergoing TKA with a tourniquet versus without a tourniquet. Tourniquet use did not have a clinically meaningful impact on PROMs in the multivariable analysis. Arthroplasty surgeons may use these data during preoperative discussions with patients regarding tourniquet use as it relates to the surgeon's preference and how it could influence postoperative function.
Level Of Evidence:
Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
More Related Videos
09:01Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis with Total Ankle Replacement Through a Lateral Transfibular Approach
Published on: January 24, 2018
09:51The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
